FLJP vs. FLGB

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) and FLGB (Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while FLGB is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLJP returned 9.53%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for FLGB. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.

Performance

FLJP vs. FLGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 16.84% return, which is significantly higher than FLGB's 6.91% return.

FLJP

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 1.74%
• 6M: 11.87%
• YTD: 16.84%
• 1Y: 34.83%
• 3Y*: 18.23%
• 5Y*: 9.53%
• 10Y*: —

FLGB

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 4.68%
• YTD: 6.91%
• 1Y: 19.32%
• 3Y*: 17.23%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJP vs. FLGB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	16.84%	26.79%	6.99%	20.00%	-16.57%	0.99%	15.76%	18.99%	-14.01%	2.53%
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF	6.91%	33.73%	8.77%	14.33%	-6.00%	17.14%	-9.47%	23.23%	-11.60%	1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJP and FLGB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.63

The correlation between FLJP and FLGB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLJP vs. FLGB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLJP	FLGB
Industrials	25.2%	13.4%
Technology	19.4%	0.6%
Financial Services	15.8%	27.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	5.1%
Communication Services	8.0%	2.4%
Healthcare	5.5%	13.4%
Basic Materials	4.4%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	14.2%
Real Estate	2.9%	0.9%
Utilities	1.2%	4.7%
Energy	0.9%	9.5%

Return for Risk

FLJP vs. FLGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJP

FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 67
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FLGB

FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 47
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJP vs. FLGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLJP	FLGB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.33	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	1.95	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.24	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	1.89	+0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.12	6.34	+2.78

FLJP vs. FLGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the FLGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJP and FLGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLJP vs. FLGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum FLGB drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and FLGB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLJP	FLGB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.49%	-42.61%	+10.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.30%	-10.26%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.17%	-13.13%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	-25.90%	-6.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.54%	-3.09%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.28%	-6.65%	-2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	3.06%	+0.77%

Volatility

FLJP vs. FLGB - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) at 3.85%. This indicates that FLJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLJP	FLGB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.59%	3.85%	+2.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.30%	12.60%	+3.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.94%	14.58%	+5.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.00%	16.62%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.89%	18.92%	-1.03%

FLJP vs. FLGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLJP and FLGB have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLJP vs. FLGB - Dividend Comparison

FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than FLGB's 2.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF	2.97%	3.50%	4.42%	3.95%	4.23%	2.93%	2.67%	4.30%	3.92%	0.43%
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	4.21%	5.15%	4.56%	3.00%	1.92%	2.40%	1.51%	2.26%	1.50%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLJP and FLGB in my portfolio?

FLJP and FLGB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLJP or FLGB?

FLJP has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to FLGB (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJP dropped -32.49% vs FLGB's -42.61%.

Which ETF is better, FLJP or FLGB?

On 5-year performance, FLGB leads with 11.70% vs 9.53% for FLJP. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLGB has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLJP or FLGB?

Over the 5-year period, FLGB has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 9.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLJP or FLGB?

FLJP and FLGB have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLJP or FLGB?

FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.97% for FLGB.

What is the main difference between FLJP and FLGB?

FLJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while FLGB is Europe Equities. FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.