FLJP vs. FLGB
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB).
FLJP and FLGB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLJP is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. FLGB is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both FLJP and FLGB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLJP vs. FLGB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLJP vs. FLGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 7.49% | 26.79% | 6.99% | 20.00% | -16.57% | 0.99% | 15.76% | 18.99% | -14.01% | 2.22% |
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF | 4.65% | 33.73% | 8.77% | 14.33% | -6.00% | 17.14% | -9.47% | 23.23% | -11.60% | 1.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than FLGB's 4.65% return.
FLJP
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 33.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.52%
- 10Y*
- —
FLGB
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -3.89%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLJP vs. FLGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLJP and FLGB have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FLJP vs. FLGB — Risk / Return Rank
FLJP
FLGB
FLJP vs. FLGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLJP | FLGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 1.66 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 2.23 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.35 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.31 | 10.37 | -1.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLJP | FLGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.66 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.74 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.42 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLJP and FLGB is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLJP vs. FLGB - Dividend Comparison
FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than FLGB's 3.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.79% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% |
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF | 3.34% | 3.50% | 4.42% | 3.95% | 4.23% | 2.93% | 2.67% | 4.30% | 3.92% | 0.43% |
Drawdowns
FLJP vs. FLGB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum FLGB drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and FLGB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLJP | FLGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -42.61% | +10.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.30% | -11.86% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.49% | -25.90% | -6.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.59% | -5.13% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -6.75% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 2.69% | +0.81% |
Volatility
FLJP vs. FLGB - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) at 6.64%. This indicates that FLJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLJP | FLGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 6.64% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | 10.32% | +4.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.28% | 16.88% | +4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 16.47% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 18.98% | -1.21% |