FLJP vs. FIDU
FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) and FIDU (Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while FIDU is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLJP returned 8.88%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for FIDU. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLJP charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FIDU.
Performance
FLJP vs. FIDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly lower than FIDU's 15.23% return.
FLJP
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.51%
FIDU
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 1Y
- 19.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.61%
FLJP vs. FIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 12.75% | 26.79% | 6.99% | 20.00% | -16.57% | 0.99% | 15.76% | 18.99% | -14.01% | 2.53% |
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 15.23% | 18.61% | 16.51% | 22.62% | -8.36% | 20.96% | 13.72% | 30.69% | -13.85% | 5.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLJP and FIDU is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FLJP and FIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLJP vs. FIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLJP
FIDU
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
FLJP
FIDU
Technology
FLJP
FIDU
Financial Services
FLJP
FIDU
Consumer Cyclical
FLJP
FIDU
Healthcare
FLJP
FIDU
Communication Services
FLJP
FIDU
Basic Materials
FLJP
FIDU
Consumer Defensive
FLJP
FIDU
-
Real Estate
FLJP
FIDU
Utilities
FLJP
FIDU
Energy
FLJP
FIDU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLJP vs. FIDU — Risk / Return Rank
FLJP
FIDU
FLJP vs. FIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLJP | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.20 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 1.63 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 6.51 | +1.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLJP vs. FIDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum FIDU drawdown of -42.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and FIDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLJP | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -42.31% | +9.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.30% | -12.23% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.17% | -20.52% | +6.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.49% | -22.87% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.95% | -5.08% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.27% | -4.78% | -4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 3.06% | +0.82% |
Volatility
FLJP vs. FIDU - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) at 5.34%. This indicates that FLJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLJP | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 5.34% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.43% | 14.45% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 17.79% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 18.40% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 20.34% | -2.45% |
FLJP vs. FIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDU's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLJP vs. FIDU - Dividend Comparison
FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than FIDU's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.28% | 1.73% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.63% | 1.98% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.37% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLJP and FIDU have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLJP has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to FIDU (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJP dropped -32.49% vs FIDU's -42.31%.
On 5-year performance, FIDU leads with 13.16% vs 8.88% for FLJP. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FIDU has been the lower-risk option at 5.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FIDU has performed better with a 13.16% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLJP.
FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 0.95% for FIDU.
FLJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while FIDU is Industrials Equities. FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJP and 0.08% for FIDU.
FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLJP and FIDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer