FLJP vs. EZBC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while EZBC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLJP returned 30.13% vs -44.16% for EZBC. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLJP charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.

Performance

FLJP vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 17.39% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -26.66% return.

FLJP

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: 1.18%
• 6M: 9.36%
• YTD: 17.39%
• 1Y: 30.13%
• 3Y*: 18.78%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.97%

EZBC

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 4.48%
• 6M: -16.02%
• YTD: -26.66%
• 1Y: -44.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	$3.99M	$4.09M	$6.89M
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	$34.02M	$41.70M	$42.19M

FLJP vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	17.39%	26.79%	5.26%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-26.66%	-6.56%	87.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJP and EZBC is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.24

The correlation between FLJP and EZBC shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLJP vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLJP

FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 56
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 57

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLJP vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLJP	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	-1.00	+2.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	-1.47	+3.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	0.84	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	-0.83	+3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	-1.27	+8.85

FLJP vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJP and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLJP vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLJP	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.49%	-53.35%	+20.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.30%	-53.35%	+40.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	-48.95%	+46.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-18.38%	+9.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	34.92%	-30.94%

Volatility

FLJP vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is 7.08%, while Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) has a volatility of 8.09%. This indicates that FLJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLJP	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.08%	8.09%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.01%	33.06%	-16.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.09%	44.31%	-24.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.13%	49.45%	-31.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.94%	49.45%	-31.51%

FLJP vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLJP vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	4.19%	5.15%	4.56%	3.00%	1.92%	2.40%	1.51%	2.26%	1.50%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLJP and EZBC in my portfolio?

FLJP and EZBC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLJP or EZBC?

EZBC has higher volatility (8.09%) compared to FLJP (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJP dropped -32.49% vs EZBC's -53.35%.

Which ETF is better, FLJP or EZBC?

On 1-year performance, FLJP leads with 30.13% vs -44.16% for EZBC. On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJP has been the lower-risk option at 7.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLJP or EZBC?

Over the 1-year period, FLJP has performed better with a 30.13% return vs -44.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLJP or EZBC?

FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZBC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLJP or EZBC?

FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.

What is the main difference between FLJP and EZBC?

FLJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while EZBC is Cryptocurrency. FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJP and 0.19% for EZBC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.