FLJP vs. BND
FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLJP returned 8.82%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLJP charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
FLJP vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.52% return.
FLJP
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.62%
- 1Y
- 31.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
FLJP vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 14.83% | 26.79% | 6.99% | 20.00% | -16.57% | 0.99% | 15.76% | 18.99% | -14.01% | 2.53% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.52% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLJP and BND is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.10 |
Over the past year, FLJP and BND have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLJP vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
FLJP
BND
FLJP vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLJP | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.21 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.65 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.10 | 4.81 | +3.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLJP vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLJP | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -18.58% | -13.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.30% | -2.68% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.17% | -5.92% | -8.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.49% | -17.91% | -14.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -2.12% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -3.06% | -6.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 0.92% | +2.91% |
Volatility
FLJP vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.28%. This indicates that FLJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLJP | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 1.28% | +4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.45% | 2.74% | +12.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.47% | 3.75% | +15.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 6.03% | +11.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 5.53% | +12.31% |
FLJP vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLJP vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than BND's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.48% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLJP and BND have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLJP has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to BND (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJP dropped -32.49% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 5-year performance, FLJP leads with 8.82% vs 0.03% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLJP has performed better with a 8.82% return vs 0.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLJP.
FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 3.96% for BND.
FLJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJP and 0.03% for BND.
FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLJP and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer