FLJP vs. AVUV

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. FLJP is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLJP returned 8.82%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for AVUV. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLJP charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.

Performance

FLJP vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 22.73% return.

FLJP

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 14.83%
• 6M: 14.62%
• 1Y: 31.78%
• 3Y*: 16.94%
• 5Y*: 8.82%
• 10Y*: —

AVUV

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 5.11%
• YTD: 22.73%
• 6M: 19.51%
• 1Y: 42.12%
• 3Y*: 19.24%
• 5Y*: 11.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJP vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	14.83%	26.79%	6.99%	20.00%	-16.57%	0.99%	15.76%	5.11%
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF	22.73%	7.44%	9.28%	22.82%	-4.91%	42.20%	6.43%	8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJP and AVUV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019	0.58

The correlation between FLJP and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLJP vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLJP	AVUV
Industrials	24.5%	13.6%
Technology	21.1%	7.4%
Financial Services	16.4%	26.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	18.7%
Communication Services	6.1%	3.1%
Healthcare	5.7%	4.8%
Basic Materials	4.9%	5.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	4.7%
Real Estate	2.8%	0.7%
Utilities	1.2%	0.1%
Energy	0.9%	15.8%

Return for Risk

FLJP vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJP

FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 54
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 54

AVUV

AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 84
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJP vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLJP	AVUV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.28	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	3.24	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.39	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	5.06	-2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.10	15.09	-6.99

FLJP vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJP and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLJP vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and AVUV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLJP	AVUV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.49%	-49.42%	+16.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.30%	-7.95%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.17%	-28.79%	+14.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	-28.79%	-3.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	0.00%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.34%	-7.91%	-1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	2.67%	+1.16%

Volatility

FLJP vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.53%. This indicates that FLJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLJP	AVUV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	4.53%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.45%	11.34%	+4.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.47%	17.63%	+1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.86%	22.75%	-4.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.84%	28.26%	-10.42%

FLJP vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLJP vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than AVUV's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF	1.61%	1.58%	1.61%	1.65%	1.74%	1.28%	1.21%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	4.48%	5.15%	4.56%	3.00%	1.92%	2.40%	1.51%	2.26%	1.50%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLJP and AVUV in my portfolio?

FLJP and AVUV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLJP or AVUV?

FLJP has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to AVUV (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJP dropped -32.49% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

Which ETF is better, FLJP or AVUV?

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 11.57% vs 8.82% for FLJP. On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLJP or AVUV?

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 11.57% return vs 8.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLJP or AVUV?

FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLJP or AVUV?

FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 1.61% for AVUV.

What is the main difference between FLJP and AVUV?

FLJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJP and 0.25% for AVUV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.