FLIN vs. IBIC
FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLIN returned -8.50% vs 4.42% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. FLIN charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
FLIN vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLIN achieves a -8.37% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.43% return.
FLIN
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -8.98%
- 1Y
- -8.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLIN vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -8.37% | 2.40% | 10.33% | 8.55% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.43% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLIN and IBIC is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.03 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FLIN and IBIC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLIN vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
FLIN
IBIC
FLIN vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLIN | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 2.22 | -1.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 16.56 | -17.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 58.67 | -59.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLIN vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLIN drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIN and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLIN | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.90% | -0.90% | -41.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.79% | -0.27% | -18.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.64% | -0.08% | -15.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -0.10% | -7.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.10% | 0.08% | +8.02% |
Volatility
FLIN vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that FLIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLIN | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 0.17% | +4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 0.67% | +12.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 0.89% | +14.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 1.56% | +14.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 1.56% | +18.87% |
FLIN vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLIN has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLIN vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.43% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.58% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLIN and IBIC have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLIN has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIN dropped -41.90% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.42% vs -8.50% for FLIN. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.42% return vs -8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLIN.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.43% for FLIN.
FLIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLIN and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLIN and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer