FLIN vs. HIDR.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) and HIDR.L (HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FLIN tracks the FTSE India RIC Capped Index while HIDR.L tracks the MSCI Indonesia NR IDR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLIN returned 3.89%/yr vs -8.95%/yr for HIDR.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLIN charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HIDR.L.

Performance

FLIN vs. HIDR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FLIN is traded in USD, while HIDR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HIDR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIN achieves a -10.29% return, which is significantly higher than HIDR.L's -36.24% return.

FLIN

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: -0.40%
• YTD: -10.29%
• 6M: -8.41%
• 1Y: -10.13%
• 3Y*: 5.77%
• 5Y*: 3.89%
• 10Y*: —

HIDR.L

• 1D: 2.18%
• 1M: -10.86%
• YTD: -36.24%
• 6M: -36.19%
• 1Y: -37.53%
• 3Y*: -19.81%
• 5Y*: -8.95%
• 10Y*: -3.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLIN vs. HIDR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	-10.29%	2.40%	10.33%	20.58%	-7.96%	24.96%	14.50%	4.77%	-7.13%
HIDR.L HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD	-36.24%	-1.20%	-14.61%	4.43%	3.09%	1.47%	-8.00%	8.24%	-11.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIN and HIDR.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018	0.39

The correlation between FLIN and HIDR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLIN vs. HIDR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLIN	HIDR.L
Financial Services	27.2%	56.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	-
Industrials	10.3%	7.9%
Energy	9.5%	1.7%
Basic Materials	9.2%	12.8%
Technology	8.4%	3.4%
Healthcare	6.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	4.2%
Utilities	5.3%	1.6%
Communication Services	4.6%	11.6%
Real Estate	1.3%	-

Return for Risk

FLIN vs. HIDR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLIN

FLIN Risk / Return Rank: 3
FLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 2

HIDR.L

HIDR.L Risk / Return Rank: 1
HIDR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
HIDR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HIDR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 0
HIDR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
HIDR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLIN vs. HIDR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLIN	HIDR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	-1.37	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.03	-2.04	+1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	0.74	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.61	-0.79	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	-2.30	+0.86

FLIN vs. HIDR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is higher than the HIDR.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIN and HIDR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLIN vs. HIDR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIN drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, smaller than the maximum HIDR.L drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIN and HIDR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLIN	HIDR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.90%	-58.15%	+16.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.79%	-48.66%	+29.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.85%	-58.13%	+35.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.85%	-58.13%	+35.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.41%	-50.90%	+33.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.04%	-18.92%	+10.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.93%	16.73%	-8.80%

Volatility

FLIN vs. HIDR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) is 4.11%, while HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L) has a volatility of 15.37%. This indicates that FLIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIDR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLIN	HIDR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	15.37%	-11.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.89%	24.62%	-11.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.03%	28.01%	-12.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.76%	21.84%	-6.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.43%	24.76%	-4.33%

FLIN vs. HIDR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIN has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HIDR.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLIN vs. HIDR.L - Dividend Comparison

FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than HIDR.L's 5.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	0.62%	0.56%	1.58%	0.73%	0.73%	2.26%	0.68%	0.90%	0.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HIDR.L HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD	5.93%	4.87%	3.49%	3.49%	2.04%	1.27%	1.75%	1.62%	1.50%	1.14%	1.12%	1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLIN and HIDR.L in my portfolio?

FLIN and HIDR.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLIN or HIDR.L?

On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLIN or HIDR.L?

FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIDR.L.

What is the main difference between FLIN and HIDR.L?

FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while HIDR.L tracks MSCI Indonesia NR IDR. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLIN and 0.50% for HIDR.L.