FLIN vs. EEMV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) and EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FLIN tracks the FTSE India RIC Capped Index while EEMV tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLIN returned 3.56%/yr vs 5.59%/yr for EEMV. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLIN charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EEMV.

Performance

FLIN vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIN achieves a -11.92% return, which is significantly lower than EEMV's 17.74% return.

FLIN

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: -2.58%
• YTD: -11.92%
• 6M: -10.85%
• 1Y: -11.63%
• 3Y*: 5.53%
• 5Y*: 3.56%
• 10Y*: —

EEMV

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 7.00%
• YTD: 17.74%
• 6M: 18.90%
• 1Y: 26.57%
• 3Y*: 14.14%
• 5Y*: 5.59%
• 10Y*: 6.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLIN vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	-11.92%	2.40%	10.33%	20.58%	-7.96%	24.96%	14.50%	4.77%	-6.70%
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	17.74%	13.45%	7.98%	7.75%	-13.94%	5.05%	6.90%	7.83%	-3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIN and EEMV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018	0.63

The correlation between FLIN and EEMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLIN vs. EEMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLIN	EEMV
Financial Services	27.2%	17.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	5.0%
Industrials	10.3%	6.7%
Energy	9.5%	3.4%
Basic Materials	9.2%	3.1%
Technology	8.4%	28.9%
Healthcare	6.5%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	6.8%
Utilities	5.3%	4.6%
Communication Services	4.6%	11.2%
Real Estate	1.3%	0.5%

Return for Risk

FLIN vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLIN

FLIN Risk / Return Rank: 2
FLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 1

EEMV

EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 61
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLIN vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLIN	EEMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	2.04	-2.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.06	2.89	-3.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.40	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	2.89	-3.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.54	10.79	-12.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLIN vs. EEMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the EEMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIN and EEMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLIN	EEMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.78	2.04	-2.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.47	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.39	-0.13

Drawdowns

FLIN vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIN drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIN and EEMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLIN	EEMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.90%	-31.56%	-10.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.79%	-9.22%	-9.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.85%	-12.47%	-10.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.85%	-21.90%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.91%	-1.08%	-17.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.01%	-7.97%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.57%	2.47%	+5.10%

Volatility

FLIN vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) is 5.21%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that FLIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLIN	EEMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	5.78%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.81%	11.71%	+1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.92%	13.06%	+1.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.74%	11.85%	+3.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.45%	13.86%	+6.59%

FLIN vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIN has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLIN vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison

FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than EEMV's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	2.25%	2.65%	3.50%	2.75%	1.93%	2.14%	2.45%	2.63%	2.46%	2.34%	2.79%	2.55%
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	0.64%	0.56%	1.58%	0.73%	0.73%	2.26%	0.68%	0.90%	0.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLIN and EEMV in my portfolio?

FLIN and EEMV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLIN or EEMV?

EEMV has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to FLIN (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIN dropped -41.90% vs EEMV's -31.56%.

Which ETF is better, FLIN or EEMV?

On 5-year performance, EEMV leads with 5.59% vs 3.56% for FLIN. On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLIN or EEMV?

Over the 5-year period, EEMV has performed better with a 5.59% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLIN or EEMV?

FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EEMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLIN or EEMV?

EEMV has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.64% for FLIN.

What is the main difference between FLIN and EEMV?

FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLIN and 0.25% for EEMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.