FLIIX vs. CSUIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLIIX (First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund) and CSUIX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FLIIX returned 5.11%/yr vs 7.46%/yr for CSUIX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLIIX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for CSUIX.

Performance

FLIIX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIIX achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than CSUIX's 10.46% return.

FLIIX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -2.41%
• YTD: 7.62%
• 6M: 7.34%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: 8.67%
• 5Y*: 5.11%
• 10Y*: —

CSUIX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -1.47%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 6M: 10.46%
• 1Y: 18.11%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: 7.46%
• 10Y*: 7.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLIIX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLIIX First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund	7.62%	9.16%	5.55%	3.21%	-4.06%	12.94%	-0.16%	31.02%	-6.06%	11.43%
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.	10.46%	14.69%	8.74%	2.46%	-4.89%	16.60%	-1.29%	24.72%	-5.52%	11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIIX and CSUIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2017	0.93

The correlation between FLIIX and CSUIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLIIX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLIIX

FLIIX Risk / Return Rank: 7
FLIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FLIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FLIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FLIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FLIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

CSUIX

CSUIX Risk / Return Rank: 54
CSUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
CSUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
CSUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CSUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
CSUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLIIX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLIIX	CSUIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	1.91	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	2.71	-2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.34	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	3.16	-2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.10	10.11	-8.01

FLIIX vs. CSUIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the CSUIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIIX and CSUIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLIIX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIIX drawdown since its inception was -35.85%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIIX and CSUIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLIIX	CSUIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.85%	-52.01%	+16.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.57%	-5.96%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.52%	-14.89%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.61%	-20.01%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.48%	-2.58%	-1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-8.15%	+3.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	1.86%	+1.20%

Volatility

FLIIX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIIX) is 3.12%, while Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that FLIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLIIX	CSUIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	3.41%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	7.88%	+3.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.46%	9.87%	+3.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.11%	12.96%	+1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.65%	14.90%	+0.75%

FLIIX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLIIX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison

FLIIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.	7.61%	8.41%	2.58%	2.53%	3.91%	3.25%	1.64%	1.83%	2.45%	5.12%	2.35%	6.52%
FLIIX First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund	0.00%	0.00%	5.37%	2.46%	4.79%	6.31%	5.71%	6.32%	4.13%	6.91%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLIIX and CSUIX in my portfolio?

FLIIX and CSUIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLIIX or CSUIX?

CSUIX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to FLIIX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIIX dropped -35.85% vs CSUIX's -52.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.