FLGV vs. SPAX
FLGV (Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF) and SPAX (Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLGV is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while SPAX is a Event Driven fund actively managed by Toroso Investments. Both are actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLGV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SPAX.
Performance
FLGV vs. SPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLGV
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
SPAX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLGV vs. SPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGV Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 0.06% | 6.22% | 0.62% | 4.18% | -11.53% | 0.38% |
SPAX Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 5.11% | 6.63% | 1.25% | 2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLGV and SPAX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.02 |
FLGV vs. SPAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLGV
SPAX
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
FLGV
SPAX
-
Basic Materials
FLGV
-
SPAX
-
Consumer Cyclical
FLGV
-
SPAX
-
Consumer Defensive
FLGV
-
SPAX
-
Energy
FLGV
-
SPAX
-
Financial Services
FLGV
-
SPAX
Healthcare
FLGV
-
SPAX
-
Industrials
FLGV
-
SPAX
-
Real Estate
FLGV
-
SPAX
-
Technology
FLGV
-
SPAX
-
Utilities
FLGV
-
SPAX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLGV vs. SPAX — Risk / Return Rank
FLGV
SPAX
FLGV vs. SPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) and Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF (SPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLGV | SPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLGV | SPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FLGV vs. SPAX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLGV | SPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.54% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility
FLGV vs. SPAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLGV | SPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.43% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.15% | — | — |
FLGV vs. SPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SPAX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLGV vs. SPAX - Dividend Comparison
FLGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, while SPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGV Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 4.15% | 4.07% | 4.13% | 3.46% | 2.21% | 1.92% | 0.97% |
SPAX Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.50% | 7.54% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLGV and SPAX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPAX.
FLGV has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 0.00% for SPAX.
FLGV is categorized as Government Bonds, while SPAX is Event Driven. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGV and 0.85% for SPAX.
Find the right allocation for FLGV and SPAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer