PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGV vs. FLJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLGV vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGV achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than FLJP's 16.23% return.


FLGV

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.06%
6M
-0.23%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*

FLJP

1D
0.33%
1M
6.40%
YTD
16.23%
6M
17.97%
1Y
32.70%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGV vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLGV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
0.06%6.22%0.62%4.18%-11.53%-2.39%-0.27%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
16.23%26.79%6.99%20.00%-16.57%0.99%23.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGV and FLJP is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2020

0.11

The correlation between FLGV and FLJP shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLGV vs. FLJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLGV
FLJP

Communication Services

0.9%
6.3%

Basic Materials

-

4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.9%

Energy

-

0.9%

Financial Services

-

16.0%

Healthcare

-

5.8%

Industrials

-

25.4%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Technology

-

19.7%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Communication Services

FLGV
0.9%
FLJP
6.3%

Basic Materials

FLGV

-

FLJP
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FLGV

-

FLJP
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLGV

-

FLJP
3.9%

Energy

FLGV

-

FLJP
0.9%

Financial Services

FLGV

-

FLJP
16.0%

Healthcare

FLGV

-

FLJP
5.8%

Industrials

FLGV

-

FLJP
25.4%

Real Estate

FLGV

-

FLJP
2.9%

Technology

FLGV

-

FLJP
19.7%

Utilities

FLGV

-

FLJP
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLGV vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGV
FLGV Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FLGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJP
FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGV vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLGVFLJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

2.47

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

8.62

-4.42

FLGV vs. FLJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGV Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the FLJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGV and FLJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLGVFLJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.74

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.51

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.45

-0.58

Drawdowns

FLGV vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGV drawdown since its inception was -17.63%, smaller than the maximum FLJP drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGV and FLJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGVFLJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.63%

-32.49%

+14.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-13.30%

+10.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.23%

-14.17%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.26%

-32.49%

+17.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-0.07%

-5.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-9.37%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

3.80%

-2.85%

Volatility

FLGV vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) is 1.20%, while Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that FLGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGVFLJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

4.11%

-2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

14.72%

-12.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73%

18.92%

-15.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.43%

17.75%

-12.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.15%

17.79%

-12.64%

FLGV vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLGV and FLJP have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLGV vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison

FLGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than FLJP's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLGV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
4.15%4.07%4.13%3.46%2.21%1.92%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
4.43%5.15%4.56%3.00%1.92%2.40%1.51%2.26%1.50%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLGV and FLJP have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLJP has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to FLGV (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGV dropped -17.63% vs FLJP's -32.49%.

On 5-year performance, FLJP leads with 9.03% vs -0.17% for FLGV. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLJP has performed better with a 9.03% return vs -0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGV and FLJP have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 4.15% for FLGV.

FLGV is categorized as Government Bonds, while FLJP is Japan Equities.

FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLGV and FLJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer