PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGV vs. EDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLGV vs. EDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) and Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGV achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than EDV's 3.01% return.


FLGV

1D
0.02%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.75%
6M
0.63%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
3.12%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*

EDV

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.93%
YTD
3.01%
6M
1.33%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
-4.70%
5Y*
-9.72%
10Y*
-3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGV vs. EDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLGV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
0.75%6.22%0.62%4.18%-11.53%-2.39%-0.27%
EDV
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF
3.01%0.65%-12.78%1.65%-39.15%-6.19%-1.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGV and EDV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020

0.88

The correlation between FLGV and EDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLGV vs. EDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGV
FLGV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FLGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

EDV
EDV Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
EDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDV Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGV vs. EDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) and Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLGVEDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.06

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

0.36

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.37

0.80

+2.56

FLGV vs. EDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGV Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the EDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGV and EDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLGV vs. EDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGV drawdown since its inception was -17.63%, smaller than the maximum EDV drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGV and EDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGVEDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.63%

-59.96%

+42.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-12.54%

+9.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.23%

-26.90%

+21.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.26%

-55.03%

+39.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.89%

-52.74%

+47.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-23.53%

+14.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

5.65%

-4.62%

Volatility

FLGV vs. EDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) is 1.11%, while Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that FLGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGVEDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

3.83%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

10.06%

-7.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71%

14.36%

-10.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.44%

21.58%

-16.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.14%

19.79%

-14.65%

FLGV vs. EDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than EDV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLGV vs. EDV - Dividend Comparison

FLGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than EDV's 4.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDV
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF
4.81%4.94%4.65%3.81%3.28%1.95%5.54%3.51%2.90%2.92%5.32%4.24%
FLGV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
4.12%4.07%4.13%3.46%2.21%1.92%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLGV and EDV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to FLGV (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGV dropped -17.63% vs EDV's -59.96%.

On 5-year performance, FLGV leads with -0.03% vs -9.72% for EDV. On fees, EDV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FLGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLGV has performed better with a -0.03% return vs -9.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLGV.

EDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 4.12% for FLGV.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGV and 0.05% for EDV.

FLGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLGV and EDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer