FLGV vs. DIVI
FLGV (Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLGV is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLGV returned -0.17%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for DIVI. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
FLGV vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLGV achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than DIVI's 10.89% return.
FLGV
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 10.89%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.44%
- 10Y*
- —
FLGV vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGV Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 0.06% | 6.22% | 0.62% | 4.18% | -11.53% | -2.39% | -0.27% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 10.89% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 16.95% | 13.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLGV and DIVI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2020 | 0.12 |
Over the past year, FLGV and DIVI have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.
FLGV vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLGV
DIVI
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
FLGV
DIVI
Basic Materials
FLGV
-
DIVI
Consumer Cyclical
FLGV
-
DIVI
Consumer Defensive
FLGV
-
DIVI
Energy
FLGV
-
DIVI
Financial Services
FLGV
-
DIVI
Healthcare
FLGV
-
DIVI
Industrials
FLGV
-
DIVI
Real Estate
FLGV
-
DIVI
Technology
FLGV
-
DIVI
Utilities
FLGV
-
DIVI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLGV vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FLGV
DIVI
FLGV vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLGV | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 1.82 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 2.54 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 2.55 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | 9.83 | -5.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLGV | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.82 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.88 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.67 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
FLGV vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLGV drawdown since its inception was -17.63%, smaller than the maximum DIVI drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGV and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLGV | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.63% | -27.76% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -10.54% | +7.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.23% | -14.58% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.26% | -18.53% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.54% | -1.01% | -4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -3.63% | -5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 2.73% | -1.78% |
Volatility
FLGV vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) is 1.20%, while Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that FLGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLGV | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 5.11% | -3.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 12.18% | -9.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | 14.84% | -11.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.43% | 15.30% | -9.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 16.46% | -11.31% |
FLGV vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLGV and DIVI have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLGV vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FLGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than DIVI's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 3.53% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FLGV Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 4.15% | 4.07% | 4.13% | 3.46% | 2.21% | 1.92% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLGV and DIVI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVI has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to FLGV (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGV dropped -17.63% vs DIVI's -27.76%.
On 5-year performance, DIVI leads with 13.44% vs -0.17% for FLGV. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 13.44% return vs -0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLGV and DIVI have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
FLGV has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 3.53% for DIVI.
FLGV is categorized as Government Bonds, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities.
DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLGV and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer