FLGB vs. DIVI
FLGB (Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLGB is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index, while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLGB returned 10.95%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for DIVI. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
FLGB vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLGB achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than DIVI's 11.46% return.
FLGB
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 20.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 6M
- 10.92%
- 1Y
- 26.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
FLGB vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF | 5.63% | 33.73% | 8.77% | 14.33% | -6.00% | 17.14% | -9.47% | 23.23% | -11.60% | 1.12% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 11.46% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 16.95% | 1.29% | 22.98% | -6.73% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLGB and DIVI is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FLGB and DIVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLGB vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLGB
DIVI
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
FLGB
DIVI
Consumer Defensive
FLGB
DIVI
Industrials
FLGB
DIVI
Healthcare
FLGB
DIVI
Energy
FLGB
DIVI
Basic Materials
FLGB
DIVI
Consumer Cyclical
FLGB
DIVI
Utilities
FLGB
DIVI
Communication Services
FLGB
DIVI
Real Estate
FLGB
DIVI
Technology
FLGB
DIVI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLGB vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FLGB
DIVI
FLGB vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLGB | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 2.55 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.73 | 9.78 | -3.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLGB vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLGB drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, which is greater than DIVI's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGB and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLGB | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.61% | -27.76% | -14.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.26% | -10.54% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.13% | -14.58% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -18.53% | -7.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -1.35% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -3.62% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.74% | +0.24% |
Volatility
FLGB vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) is 4.25%, while Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that FLGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLGB | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 5.16% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 12.97% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.49% | 15.30% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 15.43% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 16.35% | +2.60% |
FLGB vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLGB and DIVI have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLGB vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FLGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than DIVI's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 2.04% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF | 1.66% | 3.50% | 4.42% | 3.95% | 4.23% | 2.93% | 2.67% | 4.30% | 3.92% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLGB and DIVI have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVI has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to FLGB (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGB dropped -42.61% vs DIVI's -27.76%.
On 5-year performance, DIVI leads with 13.38% vs 10.95% for FLGB. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLGB has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 10.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLGB and DIVI have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.66% for FLGB.
FLGB is categorized as Europe Equities, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index, while DIVI tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index.
DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLGB and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer