PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLFGX vs. CGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLFGX vs. CGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) and Calamos Global Total Return Fund (CGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLFGX achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly lower than CGO's 27.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FLFGX has underperformed CGO with an annualized return of 9.84%, while CGO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.


FLFGX

1D
0.47%
1M
4.34%
YTD
12.48%
6M
13.62%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
9.84%

CGO

1D
0.50%
1M
9.77%
YTD
27.11%
6M
30.38%
1Y
36.53%
3Y*
25.76%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLFGX vs. CGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLFGX
Meeder Global Allocation Fund
12.48%18.82%22.53%15.37%-12.93%12.57%2.99%13.17%-6.93%22.34%
CGO
Calamos Global Total Return Fund
27.11%8.87%36.81%14.03%-36.60%13.04%20.87%45.08%-26.14%56.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FLFGX and CGO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006

0.56

The correlation between FLFGX and CGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (10 years) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLFGX vs. CGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLFGX
FLFGX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FLFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FLFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

CGO
CGO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLFGX vs. CGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) and Calamos Global Total Return Fund (CGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLFGXCGODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

2.33

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.13

3.08

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.48

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.07

8.74

+4.33

FLFGX vs. CGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLFGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the CGO Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLFGX and CGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLFGXCGODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.33

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.31

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.50

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.36

-0.04

Drawdowns

FLFGX vs. CGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLFGX drawdown since its inception was -60.31%, roughly equal to the maximum CGO drawdown of -60.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLFGX and CGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLFGXCGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.31%

-60.03%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-15.24%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-26.70%

+12.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.54%

-43.69%

+15.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.54%

-50.89%

+22.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.47%

-11.57%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

4.32%

-2.31%

Volatility

FLFGX vs. CGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) is 3.68%, while Calamos Global Total Return Fund (CGO) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that FLFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLFGXCGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

5.34%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

12.92%

-3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

15.79%

-3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.19%

20.35%

-5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

24.69%

-10.77%

FLFGX vs. CGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLFGX has a 1.81% expense ratio, which is lower than CGO's 2.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLFGX vs. CGO - Dividend Comparison

FLFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.59%, more than CGO's 6.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGO
Calamos Global Total Return Fund
6.80%8.43%8.43%10.57%12.68%7.80%8.18%8.96%11.81%7.97%11.40%10.51%
FLFGX
Meeder Global Allocation Fund
12.59%14.35%25.20%1.64%0.77%11.13%2.22%2.12%5.05%1.41%1.14%3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLFGX and CGO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGO has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to FLFGX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLFGX dropped -60.31% vs CGO's -60.03%.

CGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLFGX and CGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer