PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLEU vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLEU vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLEU achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 6.73% return.


FLEU

1D
0.07%
1M
1.62%
6M
7.38%
YTD
12.16%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.77%

WNTR

1D
-1.10%
1M
5.18%
6M
-1.23%
YTD
6.73%
1Y
100.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
43.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$191.22K$190.22K$237.23K
$4.24M$3.75M$3.99M

FLEU vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLEU and WNTR is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLEU vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLEU
FLEU Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FLEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEU Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEU Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLEU vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLEUWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.36

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

5.96

+0.74

FLEU vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEU and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLEU vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEU drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEU and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLEUWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-42.65%

+8.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-42.65%

+29.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.93%

+12.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-20.10%

+15.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

16.86%

-13.19%

Volatility

FLEU vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) is 4.38%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that FLEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLEUWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

12.79%

-8.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.47%

46.85%

-31.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.69%

54.57%

-36.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

53.24%

-36.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

53.24%

-35.00%

FLEU vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLEU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLEU vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

FLEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than WNTR's 111.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
2.62%2.22%3.18%3.25%21.45%3.03%1.94%6.06%12.17%0.07%
WNTR
YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF
111.06%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLEU and WNTR have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to FLEU (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEU dropped -33.94% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 100.15% vs 24.54% for FLEU. On fees, FLEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEU has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 100.15% return vs 24.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 111.06%, compared with 2.62% for FLEU.

FLEU is categorized as Europe Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLEU and 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLEU and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer