FLEU vs. FLJP
FLEU (Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF) and FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLEU is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLEU returned 12.08%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for FLJP. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
FLEU vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLEU achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than FLJP's 15.85% return.
FLEU
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 19.04%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- —
FLJP
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 15.85%
- 6M
- 17.72%
- 1Y
- 30.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- —
FLEU vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF | 7.22% | 41.56% | 2.26% | 16.21% | -9.14% | 23.27% | 0.95% | 26.94% | -8.54% | -1.24% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 15.85% | 26.79% | 6.99% | 20.00% | -16.57% | 0.99% | 15.76% | 18.99% | -14.01% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLEU and FLJP is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between FLEU and FLJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLEU vs. FLJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLEU
FLJP
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FLEU
FLJP
Industrials
FLEU
FLJP
Technology
FLEU
FLJP
Consumer Cyclical
FLEU
FLJP
Utilities
FLEU
FLJP
Healthcare
FLEU
FLJP
Consumer Defensive
FLEU
FLJP
Basic Materials
FLEU
FLJP
Energy
FLEU
FLJP
Communication Services
FLEU
FLJP
Real Estate
FLEU
FLJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLEU vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank
FLEU
FLJP
FLEU vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLEU | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 1.63 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 2.37 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.43 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.48 | 8.44 | -2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLEU | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.63 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.52 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.45 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
FLEU vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLEU drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJP drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEU and FLJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLEU | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -32.49% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -13.30% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.67% | -14.17% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.67% | -32.49% | +13.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.40% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -9.37% | +4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 3.83% | -0.15% |
Volatility
FLEU vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) at 4.16%. This indicates that FLEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLEU | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 4.16% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.35% | 14.73% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 18.95% | -1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 17.75% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 17.80% | +0.46% |
FLEU vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLEU and FLJP have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLEU vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison
FLEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than FLJP's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF | 2.07% | 2.22% | 3.18% | 3.25% | 21.45% | 3.03% | 1.94% | 6.06% | 12.17% | 0.07% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.44% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLEU and FLJP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLEU has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to FLJP (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEU dropped -33.94% vs FLJP's -32.49%.
On 5-year performance, FLEU leads with 12.08% vs 9.20% for FLJP. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLEU has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLEU and FLJP have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 2.07% for FLEU.
FLEU is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLJP is Japan Equities. FLEU tracks FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index.
FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLEU and FLJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer