PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLEU vs. EZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLEU vs. EZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLEU achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly lower than EZU's 6.94% return.


FLEU

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.88%
YTD
6.27%
6M
9.17%
1Y
18.35%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*

EZU

1D
-1.14%
1M
5.27%
YTD
6.94%
6M
9.19%
1Y
19.47%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLEU vs. EZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
6.27%41.56%2.26%16.21%-9.14%23.27%0.95%26.94%-8.54%-1.24%
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
6.94%40.00%2.23%23.44%-17.25%13.92%7.62%23.27%-16.76%-0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FLEU and EZU is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.82

The correlation between FLEU and EZU shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.98 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLEU vs. EZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLEU
EZU

Financial Services

24.8%
24.2%

Industrials

21.0%
21.3%

Technology

14.7%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
8.3%

Utilities

7.1%
6.8%

Healthcare

5.8%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
5.6%

Basic Materials

4.3%
4.1%

Energy

4.0%
4.2%

Communication Services

3.6%
4.1%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.0%

Financial Services

FLEU
24.8%
EZU
24.2%

Industrials

FLEU
21.0%
EZU
21.3%

Technology

FLEU
14.7%
EZU
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FLEU
8.4%
EZU
8.3%

Utilities

FLEU
7.1%
EZU
6.8%

Healthcare

FLEU
5.8%
EZU
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

FLEU
5.2%
EZU
5.6%

Basic Materials

FLEU
4.3%
EZU
4.1%

Energy

FLEU
4.0%
EZU
4.2%

Communication Services

FLEU
3.6%
EZU
4.1%

Real Estate

FLEU
1.2%
EZU
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLEU vs. EZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLEU
FLEU Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FLEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

EZU
EZU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLEU vs. EZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLEUEZUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.16

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

1.70

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.50

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.99

5.42

-0.43

FLEU vs. EZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the EZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEU and EZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLEUEZUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.16

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.45

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.21

+0.36

Drawdowns

FLEU vs. EZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEU drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum EZU drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEU and EZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLEUEZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-65.32%

+31.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-13.06%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-15.02%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.67%

-36.11%

+17.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.14%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-19.24%

+14.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

3.60%

+0.08%

Volatility

FLEU vs. EZU - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) have volatilities of 6.75% and 6.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLEUEZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

6.43%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

14.12%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

16.91%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

19.85%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

20.49%

-2.24%

FLEU vs. EZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLEU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EZU's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLEU vs. EZU - Dividend Comparison

FLEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than EZU's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.67%2.85%2.90%2.56%2.79%2.46%2.13%2.84%3.47%1.91%3.07%2.18%
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
2.09%2.22%3.18%3.25%21.45%3.03%1.94%6.06%12.17%0.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FLEU and EZU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLEU has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to EZU (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEU dropped -33.94% vs EZU's -65.32%.

On 5-year performance, FLEU leads with 11.81% vs 8.96% for EZU. On fees, FLEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EZU has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLEU has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.

EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 2.09% for FLEU.

FLEU tracks FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EZU tracks MSCI EMU. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLEU and 0.51% for EZU.

EZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLEU and EZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer