FLEH vs. EWU
FLEH (Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF) and EWU (iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FLEH tracks the FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index while EWU tracks the MSCI United Kingdom Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLEH returned 11.81%/yr vs 10.64%/yr for EWU. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLEH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWU.
Performance
FLEH vs. EWU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLEH achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than EWU's 5.55% return.
FLEH
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 6.27%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 18.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- —
EWU
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
FLEH vs. EWU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF | 6.27% | 41.56% | 2.26% | 16.21% | -9.14% | 23.27% | 0.95% | 26.94% | -8.54% | -1.24% |
EWU iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF | 5.55% | 34.95% | 6.74% | 12.40% | -4.39% | 18.19% | -11.80% | 21.29% | -14.30% | 4.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLEH and EWU is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FLEH and EWU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLEH vs. EWU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLEH
EWU
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FLEH
EWU
Industrials
FLEH
EWU
Healthcare
FLEH
EWU
Consumer Defensive
FLEH
EWU
Consumer Cyclical
FLEH
EWU
Technology
FLEH
EWU
Basic Materials
FLEH
EWU
Energy
FLEH
EWU
Utilities
FLEH
EWU
Communication Services
FLEH
EWU
Real Estate
FLEH
EWU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLEH vs. EWU — Risk / Return Rank
FLEH
EWU
FLEH vs. EWU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) and iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLEH | EWU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.08 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 7.54 | -2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLEH | EWU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.44 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.65 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.26 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
FLEH vs. EWU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLEH drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum EWU drawdown of -63.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEH and EWU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLEH | EWU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -63.99% | +30.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -9.92% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.67% | -12.63% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.67% | -24.91% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -4.64% | +3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -14.16% | +9.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 2.73% | +0.95% |
Volatility
FLEH vs. EWU - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) at 5.56%. This indicates that FLEH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLEH | EWU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 5.56% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 12.30% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 14.39% | +2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 16.43% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 18.84% | -0.59% |
FLEH vs. EWU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLEH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EWU's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLEH vs. EWU - Dividend Comparison
FLEH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than EWU's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWU iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF | 3.53% | 3.73% | 4.16% | 4.14% | 3.43% | 4.35% | 2.48% | 4.13% | 4.98% | 3.91% | 3.97% | 4.11% |
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF | 2.09% | 2.22% | 3.18% | 3.25% | 21.45% | 3.03% | 1.94% | 6.06% | 12.17% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLEH and EWU have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLEH has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to EWU (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEH dropped -33.94% vs EWU's -63.99%.
On 5-year performance, FLEH leads with 11.81% vs 10.64% for EWU. On fees, FLEH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EWU has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLEH has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLEH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWU.
EWU has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.09% for FLEH.
FLEH tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while EWU tracks MSCI United Kingdom Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLEH and 0.50% for EWU.
EWU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLEH and EWU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer