PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLEE vs. EZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLEE vs. EZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLEE achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly lower than EZU's 6.94% return.


FLEE

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.47%
YTD
5.58%
6M
8.37%
1Y
17.27%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*

EZU

1D
-1.14%
1M
5.27%
YTD
6.94%
6M
9.19%
1Y
19.47%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLEE vs. EZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLEE
Franklin FTSE Europe ETF
5.58%35.76%2.03%20.46%-15.22%16.84%5.33%24.41%-14.97%1.47%
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
6.94%40.00%2.23%23.44%-17.25%13.92%7.62%23.27%-16.76%-0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FLEE and EZU is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.94

The correlation between FLEE and EZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLEE vs. EZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLEE
EZU

Financial Services

23.8%
24.2%

Industrials

19.6%
21.3%

Healthcare

12.8%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
5.6%

Technology

8.5%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
8.3%

Basic Materials

5.8%
4.1%

Energy

5.3%
4.2%

Utilities

5.1%
6.8%

Communication Services

3.0%
4.1%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.0%

Financial Services

FLEE
23.8%
EZU
24.2%

Industrials

FLEE
19.6%
EZU
21.3%

Healthcare

FLEE
12.8%
EZU
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

FLEE
8.5%
EZU
5.6%

Technology

FLEE
8.5%
EZU
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FLEE
6.6%
EZU
8.3%

Basic Materials

FLEE
5.8%
EZU
4.1%

Energy

FLEE
5.3%
EZU
4.2%

Utilities

FLEE
5.1%
EZU
6.8%

Communication Services

FLEE
3.0%
EZU
4.1%

Real Estate

FLEE
1.1%
EZU
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLEE vs. EZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLEE
FLEE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FLEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

EZU
EZU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLEE vs. EZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLEEEZUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.50

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.13

5.42

-0.29

FLEE vs. EZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the EZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEE and EZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLEEEZUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.16

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.45

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.21

+0.23

Drawdowns

FLEE vs. EZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEE drawdown since its inception was -37.27%, smaller than the maximum EZU drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEE and EZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLEEEZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.27%

-65.32%

+28.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.37%

-13.06%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-15.02%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.62%

-36.11%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

-1.14%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-19.24%

+12.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

3.60%

-0.22%

Volatility

FLEE vs. EZU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) is 5.78%, while iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that FLEE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLEEEZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

6.43%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

14.12%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

16.91%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

19.85%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

20.49%

-1.54%

FLEE vs. EZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLEE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EZU's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLEE vs. EZU - Dividend Comparison

FLEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than EZU's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.67%2.85%2.90%2.56%2.79%2.46%2.13%2.84%3.47%1.91%3.07%2.18%
FLEE
Franklin FTSE Europe ETF
2.61%2.76%3.93%2.57%3.48%3.61%1.88%3.02%3.85%0.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FLEE and EZU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EZU has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to FLEE (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEE dropped -37.27% vs EZU's -65.32%.

On 5-year performance, EZU leads with 8.96% vs 8.65% for FLEE. On fees, FLEE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEE has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EZU has performed better with a 8.96% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLEE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.

EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 2.61% for FLEE.

FLEE tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while EZU tracks MSCI EMU. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLEE and 0.51% for EZU.

EZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLEE and EZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer