FLDZ vs. ETHO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FLDZ (RiverNorth Patriot ETF) and ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. FLDZ is actively managed, while ETHO is passively managed. Over the past year, FLDZ returned 1.94% vs 37.11% for ETHO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLDZ charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ETHO.

Performance

FLDZ vs. ETHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) and Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDZ achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than ETHO's 22.44% return.

FLDZ

• 1D: -2.87%
• 1M: -5.86%
• 6M: -3.59%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 1Y: 1.94%
• 3Y*: 9.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETHO

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 3.24%
• 6M: 16.53%
• YTD: 22.44%
• 1Y: 37.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDZ vs. ETHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	0.31%	6.66%	17.27%
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	22.44%	10.23%	11.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDZ and ETHO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2024	0.85

The correlation between FLDZ and ETHO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLDZ vs. ETHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLDZ	ETHO
Financial Services	15.9%	12.2%
Consumer Cyclical	13.8%	10.2%
Healthcare	12.9%	12.3%
Industrials	12.4%	15.9%
Utilities	11.4%	2.5%
Energy	10.5%	0.3%
Real Estate	8.4%	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	4.4%
Communication Services	3.7%	4.3%
Technology	3.5%	28.7%
Basic Materials	1.9%	2.9%

Return for Risk

FLDZ vs. ETHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDZ

FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 12
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 14

ETHO

ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 84
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDZ vs. ETHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) and Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLDZ	ETHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	2.11	-1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.31	2.96	-2.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.36	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	4.03	-3.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.89	15.62	-14.73

FLDZ vs. ETHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the ETHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDZ and ETHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLDZ vs. ETHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDZ drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, smaller than the maximum ETHO drawdown of -25.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDZ and ETHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLDZ	ETHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.54%	-25.50%	+5.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.70%	-9.25%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.70%	-0.82%	-6.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.86%	-4.34%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	2.38%	-0.19%

Volatility

FLDZ vs. ETHO - Volatility Comparison

RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) at 4.38%. This indicates that FLDZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLDZ	ETHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	4.38%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.84%	13.26%	-4.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.04%	17.70%	-5.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	19.34%	-2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	19.34%	-2.46%

FLDZ vs. ETHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDZ has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHO's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLDZ vs. ETHO - Dividend Comparison

FLDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than ETHO's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	0.70%	0.86%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	1.53%	1.54%	1.17%	1.39%	1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLDZ and ETHO in my portfolio?

FLDZ and ETHO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLDZ or ETHO?

FLDZ has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to ETHO (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDZ dropped -19.54% vs ETHO's -25.50%.

Which ETF is better, FLDZ or ETHO?

On 1-year performance, ETHO leads with 37.11% vs 1.94% for FLDZ. On fees, ETHO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ETHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLDZ or ETHO?

Over the 1-year period, ETHO has performed better with a 37.11% return vs 1.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLDZ or ETHO?

ETHO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLDZ or ETHO?

FLDZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.70% for ETHO.

What is the main difference between FLDZ and ETHO?

They also come from different issuers: RiverNorth and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for FLDZ and 0.45% for ETHO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.