FLDZ vs. CTEF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLDZ (RiverNorth Patriot ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FLDZ returned 8.68% vs 81.04% for CTEF. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLDZ charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.

Performance

FLDZ vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDZ achieves a 6.09% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 36.91% return.

FLDZ

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 6.09%
• 6M: 4.91%
• 1Y: 8.68%
• 3Y*: 13.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CTEF

• 1D: -2.45%
• 1M: 13.53%
• YTD: 36.91%
• 6M: 33.85%
• 1Y: 81.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDZ vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	6.09%	4.42%
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	36.91%	33.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDZ and CTEF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.56

The correlation between FLDZ and CTEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLDZ vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDZ

FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 25
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CTEF

CTEF Risk / Return Rank: 93
CTEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CTEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CTEF Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CTEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CTEF Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDZ vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLDZ	CTEF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	3.60	-2.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	4.48	-3.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.57	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	5.43	-4.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.22	25.12	-20.90

FLDZ vs. CTEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the CTEF Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDZ and CTEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLDZ vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDZ drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDZ and CTEF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLDZ	CTEF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.54%	-15.00%	-4.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.25%	-15.00%	+8.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-2.45%	+1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.92%	-1.75%	-4.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	3.24%	-1.18%

Volatility

FLDZ vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) is 2.83%, while Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) has a volatility of 9.15%. This indicates that FLDZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLDZ	CTEF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	9.15%	-6.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.84%	19.03%	-11.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.42%	22.64%	-11.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.85%	22.56%	-5.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.85%	22.56%	-5.71%

FLDZ vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDZ has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLDZ vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison

FLDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	0.06%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	1.45%	1.54%	1.17%	1.39%	1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLDZ and CTEF in my portfolio?

FLDZ and CTEF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLDZ or CTEF?

CTEF has higher volatility (9.15%) compared to FLDZ (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDZ dropped -19.54% vs CTEF's -15.00%.

Which ETF is better, FLDZ or CTEF?

On 1-year performance, CTEF leads with 81.04% vs 8.68% for FLDZ. On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FLDZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLDZ or CTEF?

Over the 1-year period, CTEF has performed better with a 81.04% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLDZ or CTEF?

CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLDZ or CTEF?

FLDZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.

What is the main difference between FLDZ and CTEF?

They also come from different issuers: RiverNorth and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for FLDZ and 0.45% for CTEF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.