PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLDR vs. LINE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLDR vs. LINE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Lineage, Inc. (LINE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDR achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than LINE's 22.88% return.


FLDR

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.74%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*

LINE

1D
-0.80%
1M
5.83%
YTD
22.88%
6M
25.85%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDR vs. LINE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
1.37%5.41%2.24%
LINE
Lineage, Inc.
22.88%-37.20%-26.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDR and LINE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLDR vs. LINE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

LINE
LINE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LINE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LINE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDR vs. LINE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Lineage, Inc. (LINE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLDRLINEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.70

1.03

+1.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.04

0.00

+10.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

68.61

0.00

+68.60

FLDR vs. LINE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDR Sharpe Ratio is 5.83, which is higher than the LINE Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDR and LINE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLDRLINEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.83

0.00

+5.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

-0.72

+1.33

Drawdowns

FLDR vs. LINE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum LINE drawdown of -61.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDR and LINE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLDRLINEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-61.74%

+49.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.47%

-28.46%

+27.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-48.26%

+48.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-41.04%

+40.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

15.15%

-15.08%

Volatility

FLDR vs. LINE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 0.19%, while Lineage, Inc. (LINE) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that FLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LINE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLDRLINEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

10.08%

-9.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.59%

28.96%

-28.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81%

37.61%

-36.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.21%

36.70%

-35.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.26%

36.70%

-31.44%

Dividends

FLDR vs. LINE - Dividend Comparison

FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than LINE's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.43%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%
LINE
Lineage, Inc.
5.00%6.03%1.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLDR and LINE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LINE has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to FLDR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDR dropped -12.23% vs LINE's -61.74%.

FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLDR and LINE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer