FLDR vs. FSPTX
FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) and FSPTX (Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio) are both funds - FLDR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index, while FSPTX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FLDR is passively managed, while FSPTX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLDR returned 3.70%/yr vs 22.72%/yr for FSPTX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLDR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FSPTX.
Performance
FLDR vs. FSPTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDR achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than FSPTX's 37.30% return.
FLDR
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- —
FSPTX
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 37.30%
- 6M
- 38.47%
- 1Y
- 69.56%
- 3Y*
- 39.06%
- 5Y*
- 22.72%
- 10Y*
- 27.36%
FLDR vs. FSPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 1.58% | 5.41% | 5.71% | 6.32% | -0.33% | -0.18% | 2.01% | 4.52% | 0.84% |
FSPTX Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio | 37.30% | 23.37% | 41.76% | 59.83% | -36.91% | 21.99% | 63.95% | 51.08% | -21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDR and FSPTX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLDR vs. FSPTX — Risk / Return Rank
FLDR
FSPTX
FLDR vs. FSPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLDR | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.73 | 1.47 | +1.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.19 | 4.96 | +5.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 69.63 | 16.37 | +53.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLDR vs. FSPTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum FSPTX drawdown of -84.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDR and FSPTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDR | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -84.37% | +72.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.47% | -13.71% | +13.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.76% | -29.22% | +28.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.33% | -42.16% | +39.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.73% | +6.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -27.01% | +26.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 4.15% | -4.08% |
Volatility
FLDR vs. FSPTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 0.20%, while Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX) has a volatility of 11.22%. This indicates that FLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLDR | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.20% | 11.22% | -11.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.59% | 18.92% | -18.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81% | 23.22% | -22.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.21% | 27.61% | -26.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 26.13% | -20.88% |
FLDR vs. FSPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPTX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLDR vs. FSPTX - Dividend Comparison
FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than FSPTX's 7.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.42% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSPTX Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio | 7.91% | 9.06% | 9.42% | 0.01% | 3.95% | 11.62% | 18.86% | 1.86% | 23.77% | 8.32% | 1.54% | 4.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLDR and FSPTX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSPTX has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to FLDR (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDR dropped -12.23% vs FSPTX's -84.37%.
FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.90 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLDR and FSPTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer