FLDR vs. DRLL
FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLDR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLDR returned 5.36%/yr vs 14.67%/yr for DRLL. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. FLDR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.
Performance
FLDR vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDR achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 31.26% return.
FLDR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- —
DRLL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 31.26%
- 6M
- 27.14%
- 1Y
- 43.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLDR vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 1.44% | 5.41% | 5.71% | 6.32% | 1.03% |
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 31.26% | 7.74% | 0.02% | -1.84% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDR and DRLL is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | -0.09 |
The correlation between FLDR and DRLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLDR vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank
FLDR
DRLL
FLDR vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLDR | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +7.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.75 | 1.32 | +1.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.24 | 3.11 | +7.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 70.25 | 8.82 | +61.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLDR | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.95 | 1.94 | +4.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.57 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
FLDR vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDR and DRLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDR | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -23.73% | +11.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.47% | -13.93% | +13.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.76% | -23.73% | +22.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -8.10% | +8.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -8.02% | +7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 4.90% | -4.83% |
Volatility
FLDR vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 0.19%, while Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a volatility of 9.15%. This indicates that FLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLDR | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | 9.15% | -8.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.58% | 18.04% | -17.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80% | 22.34% | -21.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.21% | 23.76% | -22.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 23.76% | -18.50% |
FLDR vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLDR vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison
FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than DRLL's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 2.33% | 2.99% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.43% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLDR and DRLL have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRLL has higher volatility (9.15%) compared to FLDR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDR dropped -12.23% vs DRLL's -23.73%.
On 3-year performance, DRLL leads with 14.67% vs 5.36% for FLDR. On fees, FLDR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 14.67% return vs 5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLDR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DRLL.
FLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 2.33% for DRLL.
FLDR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DRLL is Energy Equities. FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index, while DRLL tracks Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLDR and 0.41% for DRLL.
FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.95 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLDR and DRLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer