FLDAX vs. DLDFX
FLDAX (Franklin Low Duration Total Return Fund) and DLDFX (Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, FLDAX returned 2.28%/yr vs 3.83%/yr for DLDFX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLDAX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for DLDFX.
Performance
FLDAX vs. DLDFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDAX achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than DLDFX's 1.61% return.
FLDAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.28%
- 10Y*
- 2.33%
DLDFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- —
FLDAX vs. DLDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDAX Franklin Low Duration Total Return Fund | 0.71% | 5.30% | 4.79% | 5.34% | -4.40% | 0.91% | 3.04% | 1.80% |
DLDFX Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund | 1.61% | 4.91% | 6.09% | 7.11% | -2.59% | 5.41% | 1.52% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDAX and DLDFX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLDAX vs. DLDFX — Risk / Return Rank
FLDAX
DLDFX
FLDAX vs. DLDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Low Duration Total Return Fund (FLDAX) and Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund (DLDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLDAX | DLDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.86 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 7.67 | -4.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.78 | 22.84 | -10.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLDAX | DLDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.90 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 2.15 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 1.73 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
FLDAX vs. DLDFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDAX drawdown since its inception was -12.84%, which is greater than DLDFX's maximum drawdown of -8.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDAX and DLDFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDAX | DLDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.84% | -8.64% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.22% | -0.64% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.22% | -1.71% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.72% | -3.88% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.16% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -0.71% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 0.21% | +0.09% |
Volatility
FLDAX vs. DLDFX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Low Duration Total Return Fund (FLDAX) has a higher volatility of 0.58% compared to Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund (DLDFX) at 0.31%. This indicates that FLDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLDAX | DLDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 0.31% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.35% | 1.28% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86% | 1.69% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.17% | 1.80% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.61% | 2.07% | +0.54% |
FLDAX vs. DLDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than DLDFX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLDAX vs. DLDFX - Dividend Comparison
FLDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than DLDFX's 5.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLDFX Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund | 5.33% | 5.29% | 5.64% | 4.77% | 4.54% | 3.74% | 3.86% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLDAX Franklin Low Duration Total Return Fund | 4.24% | 4.26% | 4.32% | 3.69% | 3.33% | 2.39% | 2.94% | 3.74% | 3.01% | 1.84% | 1.71% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLDAX and DLDFX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLDAX has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to DLDFX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDAX dropped -12.84% vs DLDFX's -8.64%.
DLDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLDAX and DLDFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer