FLCV vs. IUSV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FLCV (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF) and IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FLCV is actively managed, while IUSV is passively managed. Over the past year, FLCV returned 26.87% vs 21.41% for IUSV. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FLCV charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSV.

Performance

FLCV vs. IUSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCV achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than IUSV's 10.38% return.

FLCV

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 3.24%
• 6M: 14.98%
• YTD: 18.87%
• 1Y: 26.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.70%

IUSV

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 7.56%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 1Y: 21.41%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 11.39%
• 10Y*: 11.91%
• ALL TIME*: 11.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	$2.44M	$1.83M	$941.78K
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF	$60.14M	$63.62M	$70.42M

FLCV vs. IUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	18.87%	15.64%	5.96%
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF	10.38%	12.85%	1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCV and IUSV is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024	0.90

The correlation between FLCV and IUSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLCV vs. IUSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCV	IUSV
Technology	20.7%	20.4%
Financial Services	18.2%	16.1%
Industrials	13.2%	11.2%
Healthcare	12.2%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	10.0%
Communication Services	6.8%	2.7%
Energy	5.3%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	8.5%
Utilities	4.1%	4.4%
Basic Materials	2.8%	3.6%
Real Estate	2.8%	3.8%

Return for Risk

FLCV vs. IUSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLCV

FLCV Risk / Return Rank: 91
FLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

IUSV

IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 85
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLCV vs. IUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCV	IUSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	1.98	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	2.78	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.36	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	3.13	+1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.56	12.16	+5.40

FLCV vs. IUSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the IUSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCV and IUSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLCV vs. IUSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCV drawdown since its inception was -15.93%, smaller than the maximum IUSV drawdown of -56.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCV and IUSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCV	IUSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.93%	-56.88%	+40.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.70%	-6.36%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.12%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.92%	-6.26%	+4.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	1.64%	-0.18%

Volatility

FLCV vs. IUSV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) is 2.35%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that FLCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCV	IUSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.35%	2.67%	-0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.43%	7.24%	+1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.53%	10.10%	+1.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.68%	14.45%	+0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.68%	16.99%	-2.31%

FLCV vs. IUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCV has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCV vs. IUSV - Dividend Comparison

FLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than IUSV's 1.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF	0.69%	0.83%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF	1.66%	1.78%	2.15%	1.75%	2.22%	1.87%	2.40%	2.19%	2.67%	1.93%	4.44%	7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCV and IUSV in my portfolio?

FLCV and IUSV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCV or IUSV?

IUSV has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to FLCV (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCV dropped -15.93% vs IUSV's -56.88%.

Which ETF is better, FLCV or IUSV?

On 1-year performance, FLCV leads with 26.87% vs 21.41% for IUSV. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FLCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCV or IUSV?

Over the 1-year period, FLCV has performed better with a 26.87% return vs 21.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCV or IUSV?

IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for FLCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCV or IUSV?

IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.69% for FLCV.

What is the main difference between FLCV and IUSV?

They also come from different issuers: Federated and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for FLCV and 0.04% for IUSV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.