PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCSX vs. TILVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCSX vs. TILVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCSX achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than TILVX's 14.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FLCSX has outperformed TILVX with an annualized return of 15.32%, while TILVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.10% annualized return.


FLCSX

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.26%
YTD
9.75%
6M
11.60%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
25.44%
5Y*
15.93%
10Y*
15.32%

TILVX

1D
0.79%
1M
4.27%
YTD
14.30%
6M
14.82%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCSX vs. TILVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCSX
Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund
9.75%27.49%26.31%23.51%-8.02%25.80%9.05%31.59%-13.62%17.86%
TILVX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund
14.30%15.81%14.26%11.49%-7.57%25.05%2.90%26.48%-8.38%10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCSX and TILVX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.94

The correlation between FLCSX and TILVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCSX vs. TILVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCSX
FLCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FLCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TILVX
TILVX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TILVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TILVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCSX vs. TILVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCSXTILVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.49

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

4.30

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.16

18.01

-2.85

FLCSX vs. TILVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the TILVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCSX and TILVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCSXTILVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.70

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.71

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.63

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.48

+0.03

Drawdowns

FLCSX vs. TILVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCSX drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, which is greater than TILVX's maximum drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCSX and TILVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCSXTILVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

-60.05%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-6.80%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.82%

-15.58%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.69%

-19.00%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.11%

-40.15%

+3.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

0.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

-8.26%

-5.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.62%

+0.46%

Volatility

FLCSX vs. TILVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) is 2.86%, while TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that FLCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCSXTILVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

3.04%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

8.19%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

10.84%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

14.82%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

17.66%

+1.00%

FLCSX vs. TILVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than TILVX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCSX vs. TILVX - Dividend Comparison

FLCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than TILVX's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCSX
Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund
5.92%6.50%4.26%2.83%3.07%4.71%3.93%5.43%7.63%3.25%3.61%4.55%
TILVX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund
5.21%5.96%3.04%4.90%4.57%3.77%2.26%7.05%4.68%2.01%3.14%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCSX and TILVX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TILVX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to FLCSX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCSX dropped -63.67% vs TILVX's -60.05%.

TILVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCSX and TILVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer