FLCSX vs. HFCVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLCSX (Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund) and HFCVX (Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FLCSX returned 15.32%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for HFCVX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLCSX charges 0.54%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for HFCVX.

Performance

FLCSX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCSX achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FLCSX has outperformed HFCVX with an annualized return of 15.32%, while HFCVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.15% annualized return.

FLCSX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 3.26%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 11.60%
• 1Y: 30.76%
• 3Y*: 25.44%
• 5Y*: 15.93%
• 10Y*: 15.32%

HFCVX

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 13.70%
• 6M: 14.88%
• 1Y: 26.29%
• 3Y*: 16.75%
• 5Y*: 11.74%
• 10Y*: 11.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCSX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund	9.75%	27.49%	26.31%	23.51%	-8.02%	25.80%	9.05%	31.59%	-13.62%	17.86%
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund	13.70%	18.27%	9.59%	5.81%	6.12%	29.94%	-6.39%	20.84%	-9.50%	19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCSX and HFCVX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 1996	0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between FLCSX and HFCVX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FLCSX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCSX

FLCSX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FLCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FLCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FLCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FLCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FLCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

HFCVX

HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 89
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCSX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCSX	HFCVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	2.91	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	4.22	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.51	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	7.07	-3.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.16	21.66	-6.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCSX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCSX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCSX	HFCVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	2.91	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95	0.89	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.68	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.41	+0.10

Drawdowns

FLCSX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCSX drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, roughly equal to the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCSX and HFCVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCSX	HFCVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.67%	-65.75%	+2.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-3.77%	-5.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.82%	-11.32%	-7.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.69%	-16.81%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.11%	-39.39%	+2.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-1.29%	+1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.82%	-8.24%	-5.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	1.23%	+0.85%

Volatility

FLCSX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) have volatilities of 2.86% and 2.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCSX	HFCVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	2.79%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	6.85%	+2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	9.16%	+3.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.85%	13.26%	+3.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	16.46%	+2.20%

FLCSX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCSX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

FLCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than HFCVX's 6.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund	5.92%	6.50%	4.26%	2.83%	3.07%	4.71%	3.93%	5.43%	7.63%	3.25%	3.61%	4.55%
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund	6.50%	7.39%	4.56%	3.57%	10.33%	4.81%	2.58%	6.58%	17.16%	14.97%	2.26%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCSX and HFCVX in my portfolio?

FLCSX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCSX or HFCVX?

FLCSX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to HFCVX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCSX dropped -63.67% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.