PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCNX vs. LSYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLCNX vs. LSYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLCNX vs. LSYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
-4.95%22.05%35.37%37.67%-27.13%24.21%37.97%
LSYIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund
-0.75%7.71%8.65%10.63%-7.19%4.69%14.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCNX achieves a -4.95% return, which is significantly lower than LSYIX's -0.75% return.


FLCNX

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
-4.95%
6M
-3.05%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*

LSYIX

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
0.40%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLCNX vs. LSYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLCNX and LSYIX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Return for Risk

FLCNX vs. LSYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCNX
FLCNX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FLCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

LSYIX
LSYIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LSYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LSYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCNX vs. LSYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCNXLSYIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

1.52

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

2.11

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.37

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.60

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.96

6.52

+0.44

FLCNX vs. LSYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the LSYIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCNX and LSYIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCNXLSYIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.52

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.02

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

1.47

-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between FLCNX and LSYIX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLCNX vs. LSYIX - Dividend Comparison

FLCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.08%, more than LSYIX's 7.53% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
12.08%8.35%0.36%0.49%1.18%0.46%0.21%0.30%0.33%0.15%
LSYIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund
7.53%8.11%8.18%6.51%5.01%5.96%4.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLCNX vs. LSYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCNX drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, which is greater than LSYIX's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCNX and LSYIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCNXLSYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.07%

-10.79%

-21.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-2.83%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.07%

-10.79%

-21.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.82%

-1.81%

-6.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-1.90%

-4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

1.01%

+2.11%

Volatility

FLCNX vs. LSYIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYIX) at 1.53%. This indicates that FLCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLCNXLSYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

1.53%

+5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.42%

2.43%

+8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.47%

4.29%

+16.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

4.24%

+14.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

4.21%

+16.31%