PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCNX vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCNX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCNX achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 11.56% return.


FLCNX

1D
0.03%
1M
4.02%
YTD
8.02%
6M
9.62%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
27.02%
5Y*
15.24%
10Y*

FXAIX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.94%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
14.17%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCNX vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
8.02%22.05%35.37%37.67%-27.13%24.21%30.85%30.91%-2.16%13.77%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
11.56%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCNX and FXAIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017

0.93

The correlation between FLCNX and FXAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCNX vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCNX
FLCNX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FLCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCNX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCNXFXAIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

2.55

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

3.46

-0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.39

-1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.20

15.86

-6.66

FLCNX vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCNX and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCNXFXAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.55

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.84

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.82

+0.03

Drawdowns

FLCNX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCNX drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, smaller than the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCNX and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCNXFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.07%

-33.79%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-8.89%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-18.76%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.07%

-24.50%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

0.00%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-3.79%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

1.90%

+0.92%

Volatility

FLCNX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 2.82%. This indicates that FLCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCNXFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.82%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.71%

8.99%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

11.88%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.07%

16.91%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

18.07%

+2.34%

FLCNX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCNX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCNX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

FLCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.63%, more than FXAIX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
10.63%8.35%0.36%0.49%1.18%0.46%0.21%0.30%0.33%0.15%0.00%0.00%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.03%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCNX and FXAIX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCNX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to FXAIX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCNX dropped -32.07% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCNX and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer