PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCGX vs. HAMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCGX vs. HAMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCGX achieves a 9.36% return, which is significantly lower than HAMVX's 16.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLCGX having a 10.70% annualized return and HAMVX not far behind at 10.55%.


FLCGX

1D
0.36%
1M
5.63%
YTD
9.36%
6M
9.33%
1Y
25.15%
3Y*
26.13%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
10.70%

HAMVX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.32%
YTD
16.65%
6M
17.88%
1Y
35.32%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCGX vs. HAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCGX
Meeder Quantex Fund
9.36%19.10%36.38%14.81%-13.77%27.27%-5.36%18.48%-12.35%13.42%
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
16.65%16.00%12.10%16.42%-5.63%29.93%-3.77%22.93%-17.82%12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCGX and HAMVX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2002

0.93

Over the past year, the correlation between FLCGX and HAMVX has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.93, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCGX vs. HAMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCGX
FLCGX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FLCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HAMVX
HAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCGX vs. HAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCGXHAMVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

2.75

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

3.97

-1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.48

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

5.41

-2.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.47

19.16

-6.69

FLCGX vs. HAMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the HAMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCGX and HAMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCGXHAMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.75

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.57

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.48

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.40

-0.03

Drawdowns

FLCGX vs. HAMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCGX drawdown since its inception was -66.94%, roughly equal to the maximum HAMVX drawdown of -64.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCGX and HAMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCGXHAMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.94%

-64.17%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-6.84%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-21.04%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.83%

-21.04%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.45%

-51.44%

+0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-9.98%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.93%

+0.12%

Volatility

FLCGX vs. HAMVX - Volatility Comparison

Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) have volatilities of 3.22% and 3.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCGXHAMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.24%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

9.24%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

13.45%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

18.83%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.48%

21.90%

+1.58%

FLCGX vs. HAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCGX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than HAMVX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCGX vs. HAMVX - Dividend Comparison

FLCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than HAMVX's 7.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCGX
Meeder Quantex Fund
7.71%8.48%39.58%1.17%2.73%16.70%0.53%0.67%0.00%2.92%2.00%17.06%
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
7.43%8.67%5.77%7.20%8.24%1.27%2.35%3.10%8.41%3.84%3.06%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCGX and HAMVX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAMVX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to FLCGX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCGX dropped -66.94% vs HAMVX's -64.17%.

HAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCGX and HAMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer