PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCE vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCE vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCE achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.78% return.


FLCE

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.58%
6M
7.41%
YTD
9.35%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.45%
6M
4.38%
YTD
4.78%
1Y
9.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCE vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLCE and BUFX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.90

The correlation between FLCE and BUFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCE vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCE
FLCE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FLCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX
BUFX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
BUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCE vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCEBUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.53

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.38

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

19.88

-10.69

FLCE vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCE Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the BUFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCE and BUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCE vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCE drawdown since its inception was -17.52%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCE and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCEBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.52%

-2.87%

-14.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-2.87%

-6.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.11%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-0.24%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

0.49%

+1.56%

Volatility

FLCE vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison

Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) at 0.81%. This indicates that FLCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCEBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

0.81%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

3.40%

+6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

4.02%

+7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

3.96%

+11.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.89%

3.96%

+11.93%

FLCE vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCE vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

FLCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FLCE and BUFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCE has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to BUFX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCE dropped -17.52% vs BUFX's -2.87%.

On 1-year performance, FLCE leads with 18.80% vs 9.66% for BUFX. On fees, FLCE is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, BUFX has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FLCE has performed better with a 18.80% return vs 9.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLCE is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

FLCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

FLCE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Frontier and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FLCE and 0.96% for BUFX.

BUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCE and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer