FLCCX vs. TMMAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLCCX (Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C) and TMMAX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FLCCX returned 13.12%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for TMMAX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLCCX charges 1.57%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TMMAX.

Performance

FLCCX vs. TMMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FLCCX has outperformed TMMAX with an annualized return of 13.12%, while TMMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.

FLCCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 11.54%
• 3Y*: 18.09%
• 5Y*: 11.36%
• 10Y*: 13.12%

TMMAX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 5.01%
• 6M: 5.26%
• 1Y: 10.22%
• 3Y*: 12.88%
• 5Y*: 9.74%
• 10Y*: 10.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCCX vs. TMMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCCX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C	0.00%	18.58%	25.08%	22.21%	-8.85%	24.54%	7.70%	30.36%	-9.25%	16.67%
TMMAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund	5.01%	11.03%	17.07%	7.32%	-3.11%	24.10%	1.32%	24.00%	-2.84%	15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCCX and TMMAX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2007	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between FLCCX and TMMAX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FLCCX vs. TMMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCCX

FLCCX Risk / Return Rank: 41
FLCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FLCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FLCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FLCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FLCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

TMMAX

TMMAX Risk / Return Rank: 22
TMMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TMMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
TMMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
TMMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
TMMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCCX vs. TMMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCCX	TMMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.28	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	1.89	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.22	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	1.82	+0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.65	6.36	-1.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCCX vs. TMMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the TMMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCCX and TMMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCCX	TMMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	1.28	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.51	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.57	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.54	-0.12

Drawdowns

FLCCX vs. TMMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCCX drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than TMMAX's maximum drawdown of -41.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCCX and TMMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCCX	TMMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.81%	-41.50%	-24.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.10%	-5.78%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	-23.00%	+3.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.04%	-23.00%	+0.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.63%	-33.41%	-4.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.23%	-6.35%	+2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.48%	-5.57%	-9.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	1.65%	+1.17%

Volatility

FLCCX vs. TMMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX) is 0.00%, while SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) has a volatility of 2.04%. This indicates that FLCCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCCX	TMMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	2.04%	-2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.21%	5.85%	-1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.06%	8.21%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.44%	19.07%	-2.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.59%	17.81%	+0.78%

FLCCX vs. TMMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCCX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than TMMAX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCCX vs. TMMAX - Dividend Comparison

FLCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, less than TMMAX's 24.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCCX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C	6.79%	6.79%	6.81%	3.27%	1.77%	6.87%	5.44%	8.90%	18.35%	7.06%	1.65%	2.52%
TMMAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund	24.09%	25.19%	23.39%	15.23%	6.54%	4.73%	2.15%	3.67%	4.91%	4.10%	4.17%	5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCCX and TMMAX in my portfolio?

FLCCX and TMMAX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCCX or TMMAX?

TMMAX has higher volatility (2.04%) compared to FLCCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCCX dropped -65.81% vs TMMAX's -41.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.