FLBR vs. OTGL
FLBR (Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF) and OTGL (OTG Latin America ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - FLBR tracks the FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index while OTGL tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLBR charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OTGL.
Performance
FLBR vs. OTGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLBR achieves a 15.12% return, which is significantly higher than OTGL's 5.63% return.
FLBR
- 1D
- -3.35%
- 1M
- -10.42%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 35.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- —
OTGL
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLBR vs. OTGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLBR Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF | 15.12% | 18.19% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 5.63% | 13.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLBR and OTGL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLBR vs. OTGL — Risk / Return Rank
FLBR
OTGL
FLBR vs. OTGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLBR | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLBR | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.20 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
FLBR vs. OTGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLBR drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, which is greater than OTGL's maximum drawdown of -13.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBR and OTGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLBR | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.42% | -13.52% | -43.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.85% | -8.97% | -6.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.62% | -3.00% | -15.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | — | — |
Volatility
FLBR vs. OTGL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLBR | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.09% | 19.02% | +6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.69% | 19.02% | +8.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.08% | 19.02% | +14.06% |
FLBR vs. OTGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLBR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than OTGL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLBR vs. OTGL - Dividend Comparison
FLBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than OTGL's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLBR Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF | 6.69% | 7.71% | 7.68% | 8.84% | 11.99% | 8.71% | 2.32% | 3.42% | 3.72% | 0.42% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 1.83% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLBR and OTGL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLBR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLBR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OTGL.
FLBR has the higher dividend yield at 6.69%, compared with 1.83% for OTGL.
FLBR tracks FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index, while OTGL tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and OTG. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLBR and 0.95% for OTGL.
Find the right allocation for FLBR and OTGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer