PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLBL vs. LONZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLBL vs. LONZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLBL vs. LONZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLBL
Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF
-0.69%3.59%8.26%14.83%-0.35%
LONZ
PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund
-0.25%5.05%9.85%12.56%0.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBL achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than LONZ's -0.25% return.


FLBL

1D
0.07%
1M
1.52%
YTD
-0.69%
6M
-0.66%
1Y
2.75%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*

LONZ

1D
0.02%
1M
0.91%
YTD
-0.25%
6M
0.74%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
8.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLBL vs. LONZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than LONZ's 0.62% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLBL vs. LONZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBL
FLBL Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FLBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FLBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLBL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

LONZ
LONZ Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
LONZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LONZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LONZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LONZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LONZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBL vs. LONZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLBLLONZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.33

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.93

1.56

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.43

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.53

-0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.63

8.28

-5.65

FLBL vs. LONZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the LONZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBL and LONZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLBLLONZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.33

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

2.24

-1.47

Correlation

The correlation between FLBL and LONZ is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLBL vs. LONZ - Dividend Comparison

FLBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, less than LONZ's 7.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLBL
Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF
7.46%7.24%8.05%8.37%5.53%3.57%3.22%3.97%2.21%
LONZ
PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund
7.73%6.60%8.16%8.29%3.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLBL vs. LONZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBL drawdown since its inception was -19.52%, which is greater than LONZ's maximum drawdown of -4.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBL and LONZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLBLLONZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.52%

-4.19%

-15.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-3.38%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-1.03%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-0.48%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.63%

+0.37%

Volatility

FLBL vs. LONZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL) is 1.11%, while PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that FLBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LONZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLBLLONZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

1.22%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

1.99%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

3.97%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.88%

3.26%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.77%

3.26%

+2.51%