FLBL vs. CLOZ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FLBL (Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF) and CLOZ (Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLBL is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while CLOZ is a CLO fund actively managed by Panagram. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLBL returned 6.56%/yr vs 10.02%/yr for CLOZ. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLBL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CLOZ.

Performance

FLBL vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL) and Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBL achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 2.32% return.

FLBL

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 0.26%
• 1Y: 2.04%
• 3Y*: 6.56%
• 5Y*: 5.12%
• 10Y*: —

CLOZ

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.56%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: 10.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLBL vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FLBL Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF	0.64%	3.59%	8.26%	11.15%
CLOZ Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF	2.32%	5.99%	11.85%	14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FLBL and CLOZ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2023	0.19

The correlation between FLBL and CLOZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLBL vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBL

FLBL Risk / Return Rank: 21
FLBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FLBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FLBL Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FLBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FLBL Martin Ratio Rank: 20

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 49
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBL vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL) and Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLBL	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	1.64	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	2.10	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.41	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	1.46	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.16	4.84	-2.68

FLBL vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBL and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLBL vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBL drawdown since its inception was -19.52%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBL and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLBL	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.52%	-5.32%	-14.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.18%	-3.90%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.91%	-5.32%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-0.32%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.99%	-0.38%	-0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	1.17%	-0.23%

Volatility

FLBL vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) at 0.68%. This indicates that FLBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLBL	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	0.68%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.27%	3.18%	-0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63%	3.47%	-0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.85%	3.79%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.70%	3.79%	+1.91%

FLBL vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLBL vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

FLBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than CLOZ's 7.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CLOZ Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF	7.40%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLBL Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF	7.60%	7.24%	8.05%	8.37%	5.53%	3.57%	3.22%	3.97%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLBL and CLOZ in my portfolio?

FLBL and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLBL or CLOZ?

FLBL has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to CLOZ (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBL dropped -19.52% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

Which ETF is better, FLBL or CLOZ?

On 3-year performance, CLOZ leads with 10.02% vs 6.56% for FLBL. On fees, FLBL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLBL or CLOZ?

Over the 3-year period, CLOZ has performed better with a 10.02% return vs 6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLBL or CLOZ?

FLBL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLBL or CLOZ?

FLBL has the higher dividend yield at 7.60%, compared with 7.40% for CLOZ.

What is the main difference between FLBL and CLOZ?

FLBL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CLOZ is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Panagram. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FLBL and 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.