PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAU vs. VBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLAU vs. VBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLAU vs. VBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FLAU
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF
5.99%9.48%
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
0.87%3.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAU achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly higher than VBIL's 0.87% return.


FLAU

1D
1.24%
1M
-6.28%
YTD
5.99%
6M
4.75%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
11.22%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*

VBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.87%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLAU vs. VBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VBIL's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLAU vs. VBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAU
FLAU Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FLAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VBIL
VBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAU vs. VBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLAUVBILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

12.78

-11.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

29.76

-28.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

12.77

-11.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

43.72

-41.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.51

377.55

-370.05

FLAU vs. VBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the VBIL Sharpe Ratio of 12.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAU and VBIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLAUVBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

12.78

-11.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

13.10

-12.78

Correlation

The correlation between FLAU and VBIL is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

FLAU vs. VBIL - Dividend Comparison

FLAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than VBIL's 3.66% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLAU
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF
3.07%3.25%3.37%3.62%5.91%5.14%2.18%4.37%4.34%0.18%
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
3.66%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLAU vs. VBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAU drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than VBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAU and VBIL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAUVBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-0.09%

-45.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.82%

-0.09%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.05%

0.00%

-7.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

0.00%

-6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

0.01%

+3.27%

Volatility

FLAU vs. VBIL - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that FLAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLAUVBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.71%

0.07%

+7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

0.16%

+12.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.60%

0.32%

+20.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.51%

0.31%

+19.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.66%

0.31%

+23.35%