PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAPX vs. SWMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAPX achieves a 14.86% return, which is significantly higher than SWMCX's 12.65% return.


FLAPX

1D
-0.80%
1M
1.61%
YTD
14.86%
6M
12.45%
1Y
26.15%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*

SWMCX

1D
-1.16%
1M
2.14%
YTD
12.65%
6M
10.88%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
17.05%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLAPX
Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund
14.86%14.33%15.30%17.28%-17.28%22.59%17.30%30.56%-9.10%-0.00%
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
12.65%10.54%15.28%17.20%-17.31%22.55%17.03%30.46%-9.16%0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAPX and SWMCX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FLAPX and SWMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAPX vs. SWMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAPX
FLAPX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FLAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SWMCX
SWMCX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SWMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SWMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLAPXSWMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

2.60

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.93

9.91

+2.02

FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the SWMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAPX and SWMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAPX drawdown since its inception was -40.31%, roughly equal to the maximum SWMCX drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAPX and SWMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAPXSWMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.31%

-40.34%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-8.15%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.02%

-21.07%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.09%

-26.09%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-1.40%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-6.59%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.13%

+0.20%

Volatility

FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) have volatilities of 4.69% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAPXSWMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

4.62%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

10.55%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

13.88%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

18.32%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

20.62%

-0.68%

FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWMCX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Dividend Comparison

FLAPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLAPX
Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund
0.00%0.00%1.08%1.99%1.82%2.83%2.16%2.18%2.24%0.44%
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
1.89%2.13%2.60%1.49%1.59%2.93%1.45%2.44%1.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FLAPX and SWMCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLAPX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to SWMCX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAPX dropped -40.31% vs SWMCX's -40.34%.

FLAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAPX and SWMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer