FLAPX vs. SWMCX
FLAPX (Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund) and SWMCX (Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FLAPX returned 9.56%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for SWMCX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FLAPX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWMCX.
Performance
FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLAPX achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than SWMCX's 12.72% return.
FLAPX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 28.95%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- —
SWMCX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- —
FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAPX Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund | 15.19% | 14.33% | 15.30% | 17.28% | -17.28% | 22.59% | 17.30% | 30.56% | -9.10% | 0.35% |
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | 12.72% | 10.54% | 15.28% | 17.20% | -17.31% | 22.55% | 17.03% | 30.46% | -9.16% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLAPX and SWMCX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017 | 0.99 |
The correlation between FLAPX and SWMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLAPX vs. SWMCX — Risk / Return Rank
FLAPX
SWMCX
FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLAPX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 2.87 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | 11.01 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLAPX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.74 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.46 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.52 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAPX drawdown since its inception was -40.31%, roughly equal to the maximum SWMCX drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAPX and SWMCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLAPX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.31% | -40.34% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -8.15% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.02% | -21.07% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.09% | -26.09% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -6.63% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.12% | +0.20% |
Volatility
FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) at 3.27%. This indicates that FLAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLAPX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 3.27% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 9.96% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.51% | 13.42% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 18.25% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.95% | 20.64% | -0.69% |
FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWMCX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLAPX vs. SWMCX - Dividend Comparison
FLAPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAPX Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.82% | 2.83% | 2.16% | 2.18% | 2.24% | 0.44% |
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | 1.89% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.49% | 1.59% | 2.93% | 1.45% | 2.44% | 1.41% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FLAPX and SWMCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FLAPX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to SWMCX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAPX dropped -40.31% vs SWMCX's -40.34%.
FLAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLAPX and SWMCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer