FLAAX vs. NSBRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX).
FLAAX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Oct 2, 1988. NSBRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 28, 2006.
Performance
FLAAX vs. NSBRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLAAX vs. NSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAAX Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund | -0.24% | 2.78% | 2.58% | 6.52% | -16.29% | 3.89% | 5.64% | 9.03% | 0.50% | 8.03% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | -2.40% | 10.03% | 17.56% | 15.08% | -9.63% | 27.17% | 9.79% | 41.88% | -4.36% | 20.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLAAX achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than NSBRX's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FLAAX has underperformed NSBRX with an annualized return of 1.83%, while NSBRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.
FLAAX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 2.97%
- 5Y*
- -0.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
NSBRX
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLAAX vs. NSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than NSBRX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLAAX vs. NSBRX — Risk / Return Rank
FLAAX
NSBRX
FLAAX vs. NSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLAAX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 0.61 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.80 | 0.97 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.14 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 0.82 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.12 | 3.53 | -1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLAAX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 0.61 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.66 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.75 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.58 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLAAX and NSBRX is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FLAAX vs. NSBRX - Dividend Comparison
FLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than NSBRX's 9.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAAX Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund | 4.30% | 4.21% | 3.85% | 3.55% | 3.39% | 2.83% | 3.07% | 3.69% | 3.72% | 3.65% | 3.79% | 3.84% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 9.19% | 9.26% | 6.82% | 3.01% | 3.58% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 15.68% | 7.04% | 4.57% | 1.75% | 6.24% |
Drawdowns
FLAAX vs. NSBRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAAX drawdown since its inception was -21.01%, smaller than the maximum NSBRX drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAAX and NSBRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLAAX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.01% | -45.14% | +24.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.96% | -10.75% | +5.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -19.79% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.01% | -33.69% | +12.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.59% | -6.10% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -5.28% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 2.50% | -0.76% |
Volatility
FLAAX vs. NSBRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) is 1.36%, while Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that FLAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLAAX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 4.11% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.92% | 7.73% | -5.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.01% | 15.14% | -10.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.52% | 14.29% | -9.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 16.59% | -11.94% |