PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAAX vs. MPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAAX vs. MPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAAX achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than MPA's 4.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FLAAX has underperformed MPA with an annualized return of 1.78%, while MPA has yielded a comparatively higher 1.88% annualized return.


FLAAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.57%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
1.78%

MPA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.69%
YTD
4.52%
6M
3.69%
1Y
11.60%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
-1.23%
10Y*
1.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAAX vs. MPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
1.11%2.78%2.58%6.52%-16.29%3.89%5.64%9.03%0.50%8.03%
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
4.52%1.82%6.23%9.67%-31.00%17.06%9.14%18.87%-8.00%7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAAX and MPA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 1994

0.27

The correlation between FLAAX and MPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAAX vs. MPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAAX
FLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

MPA
MPA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPA Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAAX vs. MPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLAAXMPADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

1.44

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

2.17

+0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.26

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.76

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.40

6.98

-1.58

FLAAX vs. MPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the MPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAAX and MPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLAAXMPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.44

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

-0.10

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.15

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.37

+0.55

Drawdowns

FLAAX vs. MPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAAX drawdown since its inception was -21.01%, smaller than the maximum MPA drawdown of -44.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAAX and MPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAAXMPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.01%

-44.78%

+23.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-6.42%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.04%

-15.25%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

-38.10%

+17.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.01%

-38.10%

+17.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-16.82%

+11.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-9.76%

+7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.62%

-0.58%

Volatility

FLAAX vs. MPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) is 1.14%, while BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that FLAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAAXMPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

2.63%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

6.26%

-4.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

8.10%

-5.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.54%

12.11%

-7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

12.32%

-7.66%

FLAAX vs. MPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than MPA's 2.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLAAX vs. MPA - Dividend Comparison

FLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than MPA's 6.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
3.89%4.21%3.85%3.55%3.39%2.83%3.07%3.69%3.72%3.65%3.79%3.84%
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
6.02%6.98%6.02%3.63%5.60%3.94%4.12%4.16%5.40%5.22%5.56%5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLAAX and MPA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPA has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to FLAAX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAAX dropped -21.01% vs MPA's -44.78%.

FLAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAAX and MPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer