PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKUTX vs. SBLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKUTX vs. SBLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FKUTX having a 5.84% return and SBLGX slightly higher at 5.90%. Over the past 10 years, FKUTX has underperformed SBLGX with an annualized return of 9.51%, while SBLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.55% annualized return.


FKUTX

1D
1.78%
1M
-4.87%
YTD
5.84%
6M
4.36%
1Y
12.75%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
9.51%

SBLGX

1D
-0.59%
1M
5.99%
YTD
5.90%
6M
5.60%
1Y
13.35%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
14.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKUTX vs. SBLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKUTX
Franklin Utilities Fund
5.84%14.59%27.18%-4.91%1.67%18.00%-1.87%27.28%2.54%9.58%
SBLGX
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund
5.90%8.44%27.60%45.00%-32.96%21.71%30.84%31.69%-0.44%25.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FKUTX and SBLGX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between FKUTX and SBLGX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKUTX vs. SBLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKUTX
FKUTX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FKUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FKUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SBLGX
SBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKUTX vs. SBLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKUTXSBLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.93

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

0.83

+0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.16

2.53

+1.63

FKUTX vs. SBLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKUTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the SBLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKUTX and SBLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKUTXSBLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.93

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.50

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.71

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.48

+0.12

Drawdowns

FKUTX vs. SBLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKUTX drawdown since its inception was -43.59%, smaller than the maximum SBLGX drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKUTX and SBLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKUTXSBLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.59%

-53.64%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-16.95%

+8.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-20.98%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.53%

-38.28%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.56%

-38.28%

+1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

-0.59%

-5.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-12.92%

+5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

5.53%

-2.40%

Volatility

FKUTX vs. SBLGX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX) at 3.60%. This indicates that FKUTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKUTXSBLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

3.60%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

11.52%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.92%

15.11%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

21.15%

-4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

20.45%

-1.62%

FKUTX vs. SBLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKUTX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than SBLGX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKUTX vs. SBLGX - Dividend Comparison

FKUTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.79%, less than SBLGX's 11.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKUTX
Franklin Utilities Fund
7.79%7.70%8.66%6.47%3.73%4.96%9.88%4.29%5.83%3.55%2.76%6.14%
SBLGX
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund
11.97%12.68%5.39%12.39%9.34%12.48%6.17%5.12%4.00%4.41%2.08%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKUTX and SBLGX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKUTX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to SBLGX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKUTX dropped -43.59% vs SBLGX's -53.64%.

FKUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKUTX and SBLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer