PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKUD.L vs. CMB1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKUD.L vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist (FKUD.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKUD.L achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 16.84% return. Over the past 10 years, FKUD.L has underperformed CMB1.L with an annualized return of 8.51%, while CMB1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.22% annualized return.


FKUD.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.61%
6M
6.63%
YTD
8.61%
1Y
20.94%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
8.51%

CMB1.L

1D
-1.50%
1M
-0.46%
6M
15.33%
YTD
16.84%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
27.54%
5Y*
21.33%
10Y*
16.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKUD.L vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKUD.L
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist
8.61%26.42%10.14%14.02%-14.10%20.54%-8.24%31.07%-12.21%13.09%
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
16.84%43.83%13.25%30.68%-3.56%18.29%1.52%24.83%-13.79%22.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FKUD.L and CMB1.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2016

0.62

The correlation between FKUD.L and CMB1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

FKUD.L vs. CMB1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FKUD.L
CMB1.L

Financial Services

28.7%
47.4%

Basic Materials

18.3%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
9.6%

Industrials

11.7%
10.7%

Communication Services

7.0%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
0.4%

Healthcare

5.3%
1.1%

Real Estate

4.0%
0.3%

Energy

3.6%
6.8%

Utilities

2.4%
15.6%

Technology

-

5.7%

Financial Services

FKUD.L
28.7%
CMB1.L
47.4%

Basic Materials

FKUD.L
18.3%
CMB1.L
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FKUD.L
12.6%
CMB1.L
9.6%

Industrials

FKUD.L
11.7%
CMB1.L
10.7%

Communication Services

FKUD.L
7.0%
CMB1.L
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

FKUD.L
6.4%
CMB1.L
0.4%

Healthcare

FKUD.L
5.3%
CMB1.L
1.1%

Real Estate

FKUD.L
4.0%
CMB1.L
0.3%

Energy

FKUD.L
3.6%
CMB1.L
6.8%

Utilities

FKUD.L
2.4%
CMB1.L
15.6%

Technology

FKUD.L

-

CMB1.L
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKUD.L vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKUD.L
FKUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FKUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKUD.L vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist (FKUD.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKUD.LCMB1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.28

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

11.74

-5.78

FKUD.L vs. CMB1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKUD.L and CMB1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKUD.L vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKUD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, smaller than the maximum CMB1.L drawdown of -56.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKUD.L and CMB1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKUD.LCMB1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.67%

-56.05%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-10.32%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

-15.62%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.92%

-24.19%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.67%

-36.61%

-9.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-2.96%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-15.16%

+8.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.89%

+0.58%

Volatility

FKUD.L vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist (FKUD.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) have volatilities of 4.00% and 3.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKUD.LCMB1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.99%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

12.72%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

15.22%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

17.98%

-2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

20.03%

-2.77%

FKUD.L vs. CMB1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKUD.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CMB1.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKUD.L vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison

FKUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while CMB1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FKUD.L
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist
1.38%1.56%2.75%2.94%3.95%3.18%1.63%3.13%3.41%2.68%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKUD.L and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMB1.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMB1.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FKUD.L.

FKUD.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FKUD.L and 0.33% for CMB1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKUD.L and CMB1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer