FKU vs. EUDG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FKU (First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund) and EUDG (WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Europe Equities funds - FKU tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX United Kingdom Index while EUDG tracks the WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FKU returned 7.12%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for EUDG. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FKU charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for EUDG.

Performance

FKU vs. EUDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU) and WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKU achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than EUDG's 3.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FKU has underperformed EUDG with an annualized return of 7.12%, while EUDG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.

FKU

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 2.77%
• YTD: 6.49%
• 6M: 12.08%
• 1Y: 21.04%
• 3Y*: 21.42%
• 5Y*: 7.43%
• 10Y*: 7.12%

EUDG

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 3.50%
• 6M: 6.30%
• 1Y: 12.59%
• 3Y*: 11.32%
• 5Y*: 5.05%
• 10Y*: 8.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKU vs. EUDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKU First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund	6.49%	37.97%	8.06%	20.59%	-24.12%	20.55%	-6.01%	32.90%	-16.21%	25.81%
EUDG WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund	3.50%	28.94%	-4.30%	19.36%	-18.24%	16.87%	11.29%	28.52%	-15.19%	29.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FKU and EUDG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2014	0.72

The correlation between FKU and EUDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

FKU vs. EUDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FKU	EUDG
Financial Services	27.7%	15.2%
Basic Materials	17.8%	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	12.2%
Industrials	11.4%	23.8%
Communication Services	7.2%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	12.2%
Healthcare	5.3%	17.7%
Energy	4.0%	4.4%
Real Estate	4.0%	0.1%
Utilities	2.7%	1.8%
Technology	-	5.1%

Return for Risk

FKU vs. EUDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKU

FKU Risk / Return Rank: 33
FKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FKU Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FKU Martin Ratio Rank: 33

EUDG

EUDG Risk / Return Rank: 24
EUDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
EUDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EUDG Omega Ratio Rank: 23
EUDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
EUDG Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKU vs. EUDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU) and WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FKU	EUDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	0.83	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.27	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.15	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	1.04	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.99	3.38	+1.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FKU vs. EUDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKU Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the EUDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKU and EUDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FKU	EUDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	0.83	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.30	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.46	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.35	-0.02

Drawdowns

FKU vs. EUDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKU drawdown since its inception was -54.39%, which is greater than EUDG's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKU and EUDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKU	EUDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.39%	-33.76%	-20.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.25%	-12.20%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.25%	-13.73%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.75%	-33.30%	-8.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.39%	-33.76%	-20.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.43%	-3.53%	-0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.81%	-7.72%	-3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.23%	3.73%	+0.50%

Volatility

FKU vs. EUDG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) at 5.24%. This indicates that FKU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKU	EUDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.21%	5.24%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.75%	12.44%	+2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.43%	15.19%	+2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.90%	16.69%	+6.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.43%	17.70%	+6.73%

FKU vs. EUDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKU has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EUDG's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKU vs. EUDG - Dividend Comparison

FKU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than EUDG's 2.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EUDG WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund	2.21%	2.19%	2.41%	2.14%	3.07%	2.98%	1.87%	2.30%	3.00%	1.55%	2.49%	2.10%
FKU First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund	2.71%	2.89%	4.07%	3.82%	5.55%	2.98%	1.48%	3.34%	5.12%	2.93%	2.60%	2.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKU and EUDG in my portfolio?

FKU and EUDG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FKU or EUDG?

FKU has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to EUDG (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKU dropped -54.39% vs EUDG's -33.76%.

Which ETF is better, FKU or EUDG?

On 10-year performance, EUDG leads with 8.07% vs 7.12% for FKU. On fees, EUDG is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, EUDG has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FKU or EUDG?

Over the 10-year period, EUDG has performed better with a 8.07% return vs 7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FKU or EUDG?

EUDG is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FKU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FKU or EUDG?

FKU has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.21% for EUDG.

What is the main difference between FKU and EUDG?

FKU tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX United Kingdom Index, while EUDG tracks WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FKU and 0.58% for EUDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.