FKU vs. CSHP
FKU (First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FKU is a Europe Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX United Kingdom Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. FKU is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, FKU returned 21.25% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. FKU charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
FKU vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FKU achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.86% return.
FKU
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 21.25%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FKU vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FKU First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund | 5.76% | 37.97% | -2.20% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.86% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FKU and CSHP is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | -0.05 |
The correlation between FKU and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FKU vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
FKU
CSHP
FKU vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FKU | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -26.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 6.67 | -5.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 65.84 | -64.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 395.75 | -390.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FKU vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKU drawdown since its inception was -54.39%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKU and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKU | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.39% | -0.08% | -54.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.25% | -0.06% | -14.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.09% | -0.01% | -5.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -0.00% | -10.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 0.01% | +4.36% |
Volatility
FKU vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.15%. This indicates that FKU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FKU | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 0.15% | +4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.21% | 0.27% | +14.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 0.36% | +17.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 0.41% | +22.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.32% | 0.41% | +23.91% |
FKU vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FKU has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FKU vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
FKU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FKU First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund | 2.72% | 2.89% | 4.07% | 3.82% | 5.55% | 2.98% | 1.48% | 3.34% | 5.12% | 2.93% | 2.60% | 2.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FKU and CSHP have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FKU has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to CSHP (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKU dropped -54.39% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, FKU leads with 21.25% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FKU has performed better with a 21.25% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FKU.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.72% for FKU.
FKU is categorized as Europe Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FKU and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.22 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FKU and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer