FKRFX vs. URFFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FKRFX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K) and URFFX (USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FKRFX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for URFFX.

Performance

FKRFX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K (FKRFX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FKRFX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

URFFX

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 9.62%
• YTD: 13.05%
• 1Y: 24.29%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 9.38%
• 10Y*: 10.12%
• ALL TIME*: 8.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FKRFX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FKRFX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K	4.56%	13.44%	6.67%	11.94%	-15.58%	8.11%	13.21%	6.18%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	13.05%	19.35%	11.86%	18.12%	-15.66%	17.70%	10.52%	6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FKRFX and URFFX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.89

The correlation between FKRFX and URFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FKRFX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FKRFX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

URFFX

URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 83
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FKRFX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K (FKRFX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FKRFX	URFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.91	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.69	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.87	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.30	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FKRFX	URFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-44.25%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.17%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.88%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FKRFX	URFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.86%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	13.97%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	14.33%	—

FKRFX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKRFX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKRFX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

FKRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than URFFX's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKRFX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K	3.46%	2.68%	2.58%	2.59%	4.86%	5.20%	3.66%	3.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	5.72%	6.46%	2.61%	3.39%	11.40%	8.13%	6.25%	11.76%	10.21%	5.55%	3.91%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKRFX and URFFX in my portfolio?

FKRFX and URFFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.