PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKRFX vs. LTIUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKRFX vs. LTIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K (FKRFX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKRFX achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly lower than LTIUX's 5.72% return.


FKRFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.85%
6M
4.56%
YTD
4.56%
1Y
10.76%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*

LTIUX

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.92%
6M
5.72%
YTD
5.72%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKRFX vs. LTIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FKRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K
4.56%13.44%6.67%11.94%-15.58%8.11%13.21%6.18%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
5.72%14.26%14.13%16.51%-17.48%14.07%15.70%6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FKRFX and LTIUX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.92

The correlation between FKRFX and LTIUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKRFX vs. LTIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKRFX
FKRFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FKRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FKRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

LTIUX
LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKRFX vs. LTIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K (FKRFX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKRFXLTIUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.26

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.93

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.30

8.36

+2.93

FKRFX vs. LTIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the LTIUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKRFX and LTIUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKRFX vs. LTIUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKRFX drawdown since its inception was -21.50%, smaller than the maximum LTIUX drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKRFX and LTIUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKRFXLTIUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.50%

-49.65%

+28.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.10%

-6.57%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.23%

-11.08%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-24.23%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.92%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-6.68%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.51%

-0.33%

Volatility

FKRFX vs. LTIUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K (FKRFX) is 2.66%, while Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that FKRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKRFXLTIUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

3.63%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.55%

7.64%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.61%

9.12%

-2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.22%

11.91%

-3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.19%

12.42%

-3.23%

FKRFX vs. LTIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKRFX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than LTIUX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKRFX vs. LTIUX - Dividend Comparison

FKRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than LTIUX's 8.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K
3.78%2.68%2.58%2.59%4.86%5.20%3.66%3.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
8.54%9.03%9.46%4.17%7.50%7.06%5.35%7.28%7.75%5.46%4.28%5.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FKRFX and LTIUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTIUX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to FKRFX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKRFX dropped -21.50% vs LTIUX's -49.65%.

FKRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKRFX and LTIUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer