PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKMCX vs. GWSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKMCX vs. GWSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund Class K (FKMCX) and Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKMCX achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly higher than GWSAX's 8.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FKMCX has outperformed GWSAX with an annualized return of 12.42%, while GWSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.92% annualized return.


FKMCX

1D
1.64%
1M
3.82%
YTD
17.41%
6M
18.76%
1Y
31.44%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
12.42%

GWSAX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.72%
YTD
8.60%
6M
9.63%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
5.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKMCX vs. GWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKMCX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund Class K
17.41%11.87%14.65%11.11%-6.30%28.72%11.56%25.50%-10.21%18.03%
GWSAX
Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund
8.60%2.11%13.19%11.90%-13.71%27.12%8.69%26.78%-25.30%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FKMCX and GWSAX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between FKMCX and GWSAX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKMCX vs. GWSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKMCX
FKMCX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FKMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FKMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

GWSAX
GWSAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GWSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GWSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKMCX vs. GWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund Class K (FKMCX) and Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKMCXGWSAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

1.80

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

2.63

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.31

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

2.65

+1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.97

7.00

+7.97

FKMCX vs. GWSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKMCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the GWSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKMCX and GWSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKMCXGWSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.80

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.35

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.30

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.35

+0.13

Drawdowns

FKMCX vs. GWSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKMCX drawdown since its inception was -59.55%, which is greater than GWSAX's maximum drawdown of -55.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKMCX and GWSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKMCXGWSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.55%

-55.75%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-6.54%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.31%

-15.58%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.31%

-18.91%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-50.67%

+10.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-9.26%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.47%

-0.27%

Volatility

FKMCX vs. GWSAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund Class K (FKMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX) at 2.16%. This indicates that FKMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKMCXGWSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

2.16%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

6.38%

+5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

9.65%

+5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

15.38%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

19.96%

-1.34%

FKMCX vs. GWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKMCX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than GWSAX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKMCX vs. GWSAX - Dividend Comparison

FKMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than GWSAX's 4.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKMCX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund Class K
1.58%1.85%8.91%2.69%5.49%12.87%6.82%6.73%13.52%6.66%8.36%14.27%
GWSAX
Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund
4.84%5.11%4.39%4.57%5.00%3.90%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.49%1.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKMCX and GWSAX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKMCX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to GWSAX (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKMCX dropped -59.55% vs GWSAX's -55.75%.

FKMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKMCX and GWSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer