PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKIFX vs. DRILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKIFX vs. DRILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class (FKIFX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKIFX achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly lower than DRILX's 12.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FKIFX has underperformed DRILX with an annualized return of 5.40%, while DRILX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.69% annualized return.


FKIFX

1D
0.14%
1M
1.92%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.71%
1Y
11.49%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
5.40%

DRILX

1D
0.35%
1M
5.03%
YTD
12.39%
6M
13.17%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
12.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKIFX vs. DRILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class
4.56%10.21%5.70%9.83%-12.94%5.05%10.41%14.33%-2.62%9.81%
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
12.39%19.66%17.10%21.37%-15.28%21.08%14.10%25.61%-9.07%21.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FKIFX and DRILX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.84

The correlation between FKIFX and DRILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKIFX vs. DRILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKIFX
FKIFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FKIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FKIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

DRILX
DRILX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DRILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DRILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKIFX vs. DRILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class (FKIFX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKIFXDRILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.52

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.70

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

16.18

-2.13

FKIFX vs. DRILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the DRILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKIFX and DRILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKIFXDRILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.87

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.81

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.82

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.82

+0.03

Drawdowns

FKIFX vs. DRILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKIFX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum DRILX drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKIFX and DRILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKIFXDRILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-33.48%

+15.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.68%

-8.58%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.72%

-15.76%

+10.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.50%

-23.50%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.50%

-33.48%

+15.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-4.24%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

1.88%

-1.06%

Volatility

FKIFX vs. DRILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class (FKIFX) is 1.66%, while Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that FKIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKIFXDRILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

3.12%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.65%

8.72%

-5.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.41%

11.07%

-6.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.13%

14.84%

-8.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.13%

15.75%

-9.62%

FKIFX vs. DRILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKIFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DRILX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FKIFX vs. DRILX - Dividend Comparison

FKIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than DRILX's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.34%1.47%2.40%3.26%3.97%2.25%2.11%2.12%2.25%0.91%1.96%0.00%
FKIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class
3.74%4.53%4.99%3.28%3.71%3.61%2.56%16.42%4.74%1.84%1.84%1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKIFX and DRILX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRILX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to FKIFX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKIFX dropped -17.50% vs DRILX's -33.48%.

DRILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKIFX and DRILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer