PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKGRX vs. TEMWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKGRX vs. TEMWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Growth Fund Class A (FKGRX) and Templeton World Fund (TEMWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKGRX achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly higher than TEMWX's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FKGRX has outperformed TEMWX with an annualized return of 13.75%, while TEMWX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.89% annualized return.


FKGRX

1D
1.62%
1M
2.12%
6M
7.69%
YTD
8.02%
1Y
13.46%
3Y*
16.58%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
13.75%
ALL TIME*
11.88%

TEMWX

1D
1.49%
1M
0.74%
6M
5.41%
YTD
7.43%
1Y
16.42%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
7.89%
ALL TIME*
7.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FKGRX vs. TEMWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKGRX
Franklin Growth Fund Class A
8.02%15.38%17.96%27.54%-25.32%21.61%30.71%32.08%-3.37%26.31%
TEMWX
Templeton World Fund
7.43%21.42%20.34%32.29%-22.91%8.04%3.59%12.03%-12.02%12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FKGRX and TEMWX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1990

0.75

The correlation between FKGRX and TEMWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.93 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKGRX vs. TEMWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FKGRX
FKGRX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FKGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FKGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

TEMWX
TEMWX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TEMWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEMWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEMWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TEMWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEMWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FKGRX vs. TEMWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth Fund Class A (FKGRX) and Templeton World Fund (TEMWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKGRXTEMWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

1.31

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

4.94

+0.26

FKGRX vs. TEMWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the TEMWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKGRX and TEMWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKGRX vs. TEMWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKGRX drawdown since its inception was -51.08%, smaller than the maximum TEMWX drawdown of -55.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKGRX and TEMWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKGRXTEMWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.08%

-55.26%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-13.86%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.72%

-16.70%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.22%

-31.86%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.52%

-31.97%

-0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.78%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-8.79%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.66%

-0.70%

Volatility

FKGRX vs. TEMWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Growth Fund Class A (FKGRX) is 4.02%, while Templeton World Fund (TEMWX) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that FKGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEMWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKGRXTEMWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

6.27%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

15.22%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

17.80%

-3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

18.85%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

16.79%

+2.76%

FKGRX vs. TEMWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKGRX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than TEMWX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKGRX vs. TEMWX - Dividend Comparison

FKGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.30%, more than TEMWX's 12.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKGRX
Franklin Growth Fund Class A
13.30%14.37%8.34%6.26%10.49%9.19%7.97%5.75%1.65%2.38%3.26%3.88%
TEMWX
Templeton World Fund
12.42%13.34%8.52%0.63%1.60%1.53%0.00%1.15%21.11%5.83%2.77%5.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FKGRX and TEMWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TEMWX has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to FKGRX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKGRX dropped -51.08% vs TEMWX's -55.26%.

FKGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKGRX and TEMWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer